Observational studyMedicine2017
Prognostic factors for patients with World Health Organization grade III meningiomas treated at a single center.
Observational study in Medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Postoperative outcomes in CNS WHO grade 2 and 3 meningioma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Biomarkers for prognosis of meningioma patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PloS one · 2024Pooled it
- The prognostic role of Ki-67/MIB-1 in meningioma: A systematic review with meta-analysis.Medicine · 2020Pooled it
- Inflammatory Tumor Microenvironment in Cranial Meningiomas: Clinical Implications and Intraindividual Reproducibility.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Clinical and histopathological predictors of outcome in malignant meningioma.Neurosurgical review · 2020Article
- High Tumor Mitochondrial DNA Content Correlates With an Improved Patient's Outcome in WHO Grade III Meningioma.Frontiers in oncology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We analyzed the characteristics of patients with World Health Organization (WHO) grade III meningioma to identify factors that may predict tumor recurrence and overall survival (OS).We retrospectively reviewed the patients diagnosed with WHO grade III meningioma who were surgically treated at our institute between 2008 and 2016. Survival outcome was assessed by Kaplan-Meier analysis. Cox regression analyses were performed to identify the prognostic factors associated with tumor recurrence and OS.Forty-two patients were included. The mean follow-up time was 23.2 months (range 2-75 months). At the end of analysis, 30 patients were found with tumor recurrence. The 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) were 51.6%, 33.9%, and 12.0%, respectively. At final follow-up, 23 patients were deceased, the 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year OS were 66.2%, 39.7%, and 35.8%, respectively. Twenty-eight newly diagnosed patients were included, and the 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year RFS were 63.5%, 44.3%, and 19.4%, respectively, and the 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year OS were 74.6%, 52.5%, and 46.7%, respectively. Extent of resection was the only factor associated with tumor recurrence and OS.WHO grade III meningioma is rare, and difficult to manage with a high rate of recurrence and poor OS. Extent of resection is an independent prognostic factor related to tumor recurrence and OS. We could not confirm the usefulness of Ki-67. We suggest that more aggressive treatment, such as safety maximizing cytoreduction by surgery, would improve treatment outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.