Trial reportMedicine2017
Changes in skeletal muscle mass after endoscopic treatment in patients with esophageal varices.
Trial report in Medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To the best of our knowledge, no available data with regard to changes in skeletal muscle mass for liver cirrhosis (LC) patients with esophageal varices (EVs) undergoing endoscopic therapy as a primary prophylaxis could exist. As endoscopic therapies, such as endoscopic injection sclerotherapy or endoscopic band ligation for EVs, accompany invasive procedure and patients with EVs receiving endoscopic therapies mostly rest in bed during hospitalization, clarifying these issues are clinically of importance. The purposes of this study were therefore to examine changes in skeletal muscle mass for LC patients with EVs undergoing endoscopic therapy as a primary prophylaxis and to identify pretreatment predictors which are associated with the amelioration in skeletal muscle mass. This is a subgroup analysis in our previous randomized controlled trial. A total of 51 LC patients with EVs were analyzed. Skeletal muscle mass was assessed using bioimpedance analysis (BIA). Skeletal muscle index (SMI) was defined as sum of skeletal muscle mass in body trunk and upper and lower extremities divided by height squared (cm/m) using data for BIA. We compared the changes in SMI at baseline and SMI at Day 50 after endoscopic treatment for EVs. Our study cohort included 33 males and 18 females with median (range) age of 62 (29-81) years. There were 31 patients with Child-Pugh A and 20 with Child-Pugh B. The median SMI for the entire cohort at baseline was 8.96 cm/m (range, 5.87-13.11 cm/m), while the median SMI for the entire cohort at Day 50 was 8.83 cm/m (range, 5.59-12.29 cm/m) (P = .9995). In baseline characteristics, prealbumin (P = .0477), branched-chain amino acid to tyrosine ratio (BTR) (P = .0056), and retinol-binding protein (P = .0296) in the increased SMI group (n = 15) were significantly higher than those in the nonincreased SMI group (n = 36). Multivariate analysis for the above 3 significant factors showed that only BTR was a significant prognostic pretreatment factor linked to the presence of increased SMI (P = .0235). In conclusion, pretreatment BTR level can be helpful for predicting increased SMI after endoscopic therapy as a primary prophylaxis for LC patients with EVs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.