ArticleMedicine2017
Outcomes of primary gastric transposition for long-gap esophageal atresia in neonates.
Article in Medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Complete recovery without complications after reversed gastric tube esophagoplasty in an exceptional case of esophageal and anorectal atresia: a report from Syria.International journal of surgery case reports · 2026Article
- Clinical outcome, quality of life, and mental health in long-gap esophageal atresia: comparison of gastric sleeve pull-up and delayed primary anastomosis.Pediatric surgery international · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGastric transposition is a relatively novel method of esophageal replacement. The purpose of this retrospective study was to assess the outcomes of long-gap esophageal atresia (LGEA) treated with esophageal replacement using primary gastric transposition in neonates.
methodsBetween March 2008 and May 2015, 14 newborns with LGEA were treated in our hospital. They were all found to have gaps of over 3 cm at the time of the surgery and were diagnosed with LGEA. Primary gastric transposition was performed. They also underwent a gastric drainage procedure by pyloromyotomy. The nasogastric tube was removed if no anastomotic fistula was present and oral feeding was initiated. After initial recovery and discharge, the patients were evaluated with outpatient follow-ups or telephone follow-ups from 1 month after the surgery.
resultsThe mean age of the neonates at the time of the surgery was 32 hours (range, 4-96 h). The mean birth weight was 2550 g (range, 2100-3500 g). There were 2 deaths in this series of patients due to respiratory failure or withdrawal of treatment by the parents, with a mortality rate of 14.3%. Seven of the neonates developed unilateral or bilateral severe pneumonia. Early anastomotic leak occurred in 3 cases and anastomotic strictures occurred in 4 cases. These 4 neonates were able to eat a fairly normal diet after esophageal balloon dilation. Gastroesophageal reflux occurred in 7 of 12 cases. Feeding multiple small meals and postural support for positioning and feeding were instructed for these 7 cases. Subsequently, the symptoms alleviated and they had no additional surgical therapy. None of the neonates had delayed gastric emptying or gastric retention.
conclusionPrimary gastric transposition may be a rewarding reconstructive option in the treatment of LGEA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.