Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28657610›Full record

ArticleJournal of personalized medicine2017

The Clinical and Economic Impact of Inaccurate EGFR Mutation Tests in the Treatment of Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Mindy M Cheng, John F Palma, Sidney Scudder, Nick Poulios, Oliver Liesenfeld

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of personalized medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Budget Impact Analysis ofDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  6. Evaluation of TwoCancers · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mindy M ChengRoche Molecular Systems, Inc., 4300 Hacienda Dr., Pleasanton, CA 94588, USA. mindy.cheng@roche.com.
John F PalmaRoche Sequencing Solutions, 4300 Hacienda Dr., Pleasanton, CA 94588, USA. john.palma@roche.com.
Sidney ScudderRoche Molecular Systems, Inc., 4300 Hacienda Dr., Pleasanton, CA 94588, USA. sid.scudder@roche.com.
Nick PouliosRoche Molecular Systems, Inc., 4300 Hacienda Dr., Pleasanton, CA 94588, USA. nick.poulios@roche.com.
Oliver LiesenfeldRoche Molecular Systems, Inc., 4300 Hacienda Dr., Pleasanton, CA 94588, USA. oliver.liesenfeld@roche.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advances in personalized medicine are supported by companion diagnostic molecular tests. Testing accuracy is critical for selecting patients for optimal therapy and reducing treatment-related toxicity. We assessed the clinical and economic impact of inaccurate test results between laboratory developed tests (LDTs) and a US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved test for detection of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations. Using a hypothetical US cohort of newly diagnosed metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients and EURTAC (erlotinib versus standard chemotherapy as first-line treatment for European patients with advanced EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer) clinical trial data, we developed a decision analytic model to estimate the probability of misclassification with LDTs compared to a FDA-approved test. We estimated the clinical and economic impact of inaccurate test results by quantifying progression-free and quality-adjusted progression-free life years (PFLYs, QAPFLYs) lost, and costs due to incorrect treatment. The base-case analysis estimated 2.3% (n = 1422) of 60,502 newly diagnosed metastatic NSCLC patients would be misclassified with LDTs compared to 1% (n = 577) with a FDA-approved test. An average of 477 and 194 PFLYs were lost among the misclassified patients tested with LDTs compared to the FDA-approved test, respectively. Aggregate treatment costs for patients tested with LDTs were approximately $7.3 million more than with the FDA-approved test, due to higher drug and adverse event costs among patients incorrectly treated with targeted therapy or chemotherapy, respectively. Invalid tests contributed to greater probability of patient misclassification and incorrect therapy. In conclusion, risks associated with inaccurate EGFR mutation tests pose marked clinical and economic consequences to society. Utilization of molecular diagnostic tests with demonstrated accuracy could help to maximize the potential of personalized medicine.

Indexed as

companion diagnostic testepidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)health care costsin vitro diagnostic (IVD)molecular diagnostic assaynon-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

Identifiers

PMID28657610
PMCPMC5618152

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.