ReviewActa bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis2017
Bone scan in painful knee arthroplasty: obsolete or actual examination?
Review in Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Is three-phase bone scintigraphy really obsolete? : a combined TPBS-CRP diagnostic method.Bone & joint research · 2026Article
- From image to index: diagnostic accuracy of a novel semi-quantitative approach for assessing suspected periprosthetic joint infection with triple-phase bone scintigraphy.Annals of nuclear medicine · 2025Article
- Cementless total knee arthroplasty: Why, when, and how.Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma · 2025Review
- Leukocyte scintigraphy has high specificity but low sensitivity in diagnosing persistent periprosthetic joint infection before reimplantation in two-stage revision.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2025Article
- An artificial intelligence framework for the diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection based onEuropean radiology · 2023Article
- HMGB-1 Levels in Painful Knee Arthroplasty: Is it Possible to Distingue Periprosthetic Joint Infection and Aseptic Loosening?Indian journal of orthopaedics · 2023Article
- Emerging Technologies in Diagnosing Periprosthetic Joint Infections.Indian journal of orthopaedics · 2023Review
- Can bone scintigraphy reflect the progression of osteoarthritis after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty?PloS one · 2023Article
- The Temporal Impact of Prosthesis Implantation and Semi-Quantitative Criteria on the Diagnostic Efficacy of Triple-Phase Bone Scanning for Periprosthetic Joint Infection.Orthopaedic surgery · 2022Article
- Bone loss in aseptic revision total knee arthroplasty: management and outcomes.Knee surgery & related research · 2022Review
- The Role of Nuclear Medicine Imaging withDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Management of periprosthetic knee joint infections: focus on the role of Nuclear Medicine (v2).Orthopedic reviews · 2022Article
- Nuclear imaging does not have clear added value in patients with low a priori chance of periprosthetic joint infection. A retrospective single-center experience.Journal of bone and joint infection · 2022Article
- Risk Factors Related to Poor Outcomes in the Treatment of Non-conventional Periprosthetic Infection.Revista brasileira de ortopedia · 2021Article
- Revision knee surgery: the practical approach.EFORT open reviews · 2021Review
- The Role of Imaging Techniques to Define a Peri-Prosthetic Hip and Knee Joint Infection: Multidisciplinary Consensus Statements.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
ptic loosening, instability and infection are the major causes of TKA failure. For many years, nuclear medicine (NM) imaging was helpful to frame a painful total joint arthroplasty. The differentiation of septic from aseptic prosthetic loosening is critical. The latest AAOS guidelines to detect periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) restrict the role of NM scintigraphy. On the other hand, several studies suggest that NM imaging plays an important role in the evaluation of patients with painful prosthesis, but its specificity in differentiating aseptic loosening from infection is low. Moreover, scintigraphic exams showed different diagnostic accuracy in TKA compared to total hip arthroplasty (THA). PURPOSE: To assess and discuss current knowledges about the diagnostic value of the various scans in TKA failure alone.
methodsWe perform a pubmed/medline search to identify all papers published in the literature matching the following key words: "total knee arthroplasty", "bone", "scintigraphy", "imaging", "three-phase", "triple-phase", "99mTc-HDP", "99mTc-MDP", "99mTc-hydroxymethane diphosphonate", and "99m Tc-methylenediphosphonate", "leukocyte scanning", "labeled leukocyte scintigraphy", "antigranulocyte", "nuclear medicine", "septic loosening", "aseptic loosening" and "infection".
resultsThree phases bone scintigraphy results an early diagnostic screening test or part of the preoperative tests for painful TKA and when PJI is suspected. Instead, leukocyte/bone marrow scintigraphy is superior to other scintigraphic tools in diagnosis of TKA infections. Granulocyte scintigraphy, seems to be an excellent choice when the diagnosis is unclear. Moreover, nuclear diagnostic tests showed different diagnostic accuracy between TKA and THA.
conclusionsAlthough nuclear diagnostic tests for THA failure are superior in diagnostic accuracy compared to TKA, NM scintigraphy is still an effective tool in the identification of chronic, low grade PJI. To date, scintigraphic exams have an higher levels of sensitivity, specificity and accuracy. Currently, leukocyte/bone marrow scintigraphy is considered the gold standard for this aim. Nevertheless, further studies are needed to assess and improve the accuracy of the scintigraphic exams in order to discriminate the causes of failure for painful TKA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.