Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28657408›Full record

ArticleJournal of adolescent and young adult oncology2017

Shared Care of Childhood Cancer Survivors: A Telemedicine Feasibility Study.

Aimee G Costello, Bethany D Nugent, Noelle Conover, Amanda Moore, Kathleen Dempsey, Jean M Tersak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of adolescent and young adult oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Aimee G Costello1 Division of Hematology, Oncology, and Blood and Marrow Transplant, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh of UPMC , Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Bethany D Nugent2 School of Nursing, University of Pittsburgh , Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Noelle Conover1 Division of Hematology, Oncology, and Blood and Marrow Transplant, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh of UPMC , Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Amanda Moore1 Division of Hematology, Oncology, and Blood and Marrow Transplant, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh of UPMC , Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Kathleen Dempsey1 Division of Hematology, Oncology, and Blood and Marrow Transplant, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh of UPMC , Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Jean M Tersak1 Division of Hematology, Oncology, and Blood and Marrow Transplant, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh of UPMC , Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWith an increasing number of childhood cancer survivors (CCSs), determining the best model of survivorship transition care is becoming a growing priority. Shared care between pediatric oncology and adult primary care is often necessary, making survivorship a time of transition, but effective standard models are lacking. We sought to provide a more integrated approach to transition using telemedicine.

methodsRecruited primary care provider/CCS dyads were instructed to log-in to a password-protected virtual meeting room using telemedicine equipment at the time or a regularly scheduled office visit. Dyads were joined by a pediatric survivorship clinic team member who conducted the telemedicine portion of the transition visit, which consisted of the review of an individualized treatment summary and care plan. Postquestionnaires were developed to evaluate key points such as fund of knowledge, satisfaction with the visit, and effectiveness of this electronic tool.

resultsThere were 19 transition visits conducted, 13 of which used the telemedicine equipment as planned. Those that did not use the equipment were primarily unable to due to technical difficulties. Postquestionnaires were overall positive, confirming increased knowledge, comfort and abilities, and patient satisfaction in survivorship care. Negative comments were primarily related to equipment difficulties.

conclusionsA gap still remains in helping CCSs transition from oncology to primary care and this pilot study offered insights into how we might better bridge that gap through the use of telemedicine. Further research is needed to refine the transition process for CCSs, including evaluation and testing models for standard of care.

Indexed as

AdultCancer SurvivorsCross-Sectional StudiesFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMalePilot ProjectsTelemedicineYoung Adultchildhood cancerlate effectsprimary caresurvivorshiptelemedicinetransition

Identifiers

PMID28657408
PMCPMC5725630

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.