Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28657150›Full record

ArticleGenetic epidemiology2017

Improving power for rare-variant tests by integrating external controls.

Seunggeun Lee, Sehee Kim, Christian Fuchsberger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetic epidemiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Replication of a GWAS signal nearBlood neoplasia · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Complex-Trait Prediction in the Era of Big Data.Trends in genetics : TIG · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Seunggeun LeeDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8097-3878
Sehee KimDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Christian FuchsbergerDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

Funding

Statistical and computational methods for rare variant association analysisR01HG008773 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI MUKHERJEE, BHRAMAR · 2016 to 2020
$1.9M
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG008773
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Due to the drop in sequencing cost, the number of sequenced genomes is increasing rapidly. To improve power of rare-variant tests, these sequenced samples could be used as external control samples in addition to control samples from the study itself. However, when using external controls, possible batch effects due to the use of different sequencing platforms or genotype calling pipelines can dramatically increase type I error rates. To address this, we propose novel summary statistics based single and gene- or region-based rare-variant tests that allow the integration of external controls while controlling for type I error. Our approach is based on the insight that batch effects on a given variant can be assessed by comparing odds ratio estimates using internal controls only vs. using combined control samples of internal and external controls. From simulation experiments and the analysis of data from age-related macular degeneration and type 2 diabetes studies, we demonstrate that our method can substantially improve power while controlling for type I error rate.

Indexed as

Polymorphism, Single NucleotideStatistics as TopicComputer SimulationDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2High-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansSequence Analysis, DNAexternal controlsnext-generation sequencingRare-variant test

Identifiers

PMID28657150
PMCPMC6082405

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.