Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28656622›Full record

ArticleJournal of anatomy2017

A population level atlas of Mus musculus craniofacial skeleton and automated image-based shape analysis.

A Murat Maga, Nicholas J Tustison, Brian B Avants

Open access · bronzeAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of anatomy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Shape and Size Variations of Distal Phalanges in Cattle.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  3. Opportunities and Challenges in Applying AI to Evolutionary Morphology.Integrative organismal biology (Oxford, England) · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

A Murat MagaDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Craniofacial Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7921-9018
Nicholas J TustisonDepartment of Radiology and Medical Imaging, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Brian B AvantsBiogen, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Biogen (United States) · USUniversity of Virginia · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

Shape Optimizing Diffeomorphisms for Computational BiologyR01EB006266 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI GEE, JAMES C · 2006 to 2009
$1.5M
Maternal alcohol exposure: impact on genetic control of craniofacial phenotypeR00DE021417 · NIDCR · SEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI MAGA, ALI MURAT · 2013 to 2015
$737k
Inbred Mice Strains: Untapped Resource For Genome-Wide Quantitative Association Study For Craniofacial ShapeR03DE027110 · NIDCR · SEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI MAGA, ALI MURAT · 2017 to 2018
$377k
Imaging genomics bases of pediatric executive functioningK01ES025432 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI AVANTS, BRIAN · 2014 to 2015
$319k
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB006266NIDCR NIH HHS R00 DE021417NIDCR NIH HHS R03 DE027110NIEHS NIH HHS K01 ES025432
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Laboratory mice are staples for evo/devo and genetics studies. Inbred strains provide a uniform genetic background to manipulate and understand gene-environment interactions, while their crosses have been instrumental in studies of genetic architecture, integration and modularity, and mapping of complex biological traits. Recently, there have been multiple large-scale studies of laboratory mice to further our understanding of the developmental basis, evolution, and genetic control of shape variation in the craniofacial skeleton (i.e. skull and mandible). These experiments typically use micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) to capture the craniofacial phenotype in 3D and rely on manually annotated anatomical landmarks to conduct statistical shape analysis. Although the common choice for imaging modality and phenotyping provides the potential for collaborative research for even larger studies with more statistical power, the investigator (or lab-specific) nature of the data collection hampers these efforts. Investigators are rightly concerned that subtle differences in how anatomical landmarks were recorded will create systematic bias between studies that will eventually influence scientific findings. Even if researchers are willing to repeat landmark annotation on a combined dataset, different lab practices and software choices may create obstacles for standardization beyond the underlying imaging data. Here, we propose a freely available analysis system that could assist in the standardization of micro-CT studies in the mouse. Our proposal uses best practices developed in biomedical imaging and takes advantage of existing open-source software and imaging formats. Our first contribution is the creation of a synthetic template for the adult mouse craniofacial skeleton from 25 inbred strains and five F1 crosses that are widely used in biological research. The template contains a fully segmented cranium, left and right hemi-mandibles, endocranial space, and the first few cervical vertebrae. We have been using this template in our lab to segment and isolate cranial structures in an automated fashion from a mixed population of mice, including craniofacial mutants, aged 4-12.5 weeks. As a secondary contribution, we demonstrate an application of nearly automated shape analysis, using symmetric diffeomorphic image registration. This approach, which we call diGPA, closely approximates the popular generalized Procrustes analysis (GPA) but negates the collection of anatomical landmarks. We achieve our goals by using the open-source advanced normalization tools (ANT) image quantification library, as well as its associated R library (ANTsR) for statistical image analysis. Finally, we make a plea to investigators to commit to using open imaging standards and software in their labs to the extent possible to increase the potential for data exchange and improve the reproducibility of findings. Future work will incorporate more anatomical detail (such as individual cranial bones, turbinals, dentition, middle ear ossicles) and more diversity into the template.

Indexed as

Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedAnimalsFemaleMiceSkullX-Ray Microtomographygeometrics morphometricsimage-based shape analysisimage processinglandmarkingmicroCTsegmentation

Identifiers

PMID28656622
PMCPMC5554826
OpenAlexW2733149489

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.