ArticleJournal of anatomy2017
A population level atlas of Mus musculus craniofacial skeleton and automated image-based shape analysis.
Article in Journal of anatomy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.
- Leveraging descriptor learning and functional map-based shape matching for automated anatomical Landmarking in mouse mandibles.Journal of anatomy · 2025Article
- Shape and Size Variations of Distal Phalanges in Cattle.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024Article
- Opportunities and Challenges in Applying AI to Evolutionary Morphology.Integrative organismal biology (Oxford, England) · 2024Review
- A murine model of hnRNPH2-related neurodevelopmental disorder reveals a mechanism for genetic compensation by Hnrnph1.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2023Article
- An Anatomical Template for the Normalization of Medical Images of Adult Human Hands.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Automated morphological phenotyping using learned shape descriptors and functional maps: A novel approach to geometric morphometrics.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- MusMorph, a database of standardized mouse morphology data for morphometric meta-analyses.Scientific data · 2022Article
- Comparing and combining sliding semilandmarks and weighted spherical harmonics for shape analysis.Journal of anatomy · 2022Article
- Computational anatomy and geometric shape analysis enables analysis of complex craniofacial phenotypes in zebrafish.Biology open · 2022Article
- Testing the accuracy of 3D automatic landmarking via genome-wide association studies.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2022Article
- Automated landmarking via multiple templates.PloS one · 2022Article
- ALPACA: A fast and accurate computer vision approach for automated landmarking of three-dimensional biological structures.Methods in ecology and evolution · 2021Article
- SlicerMorph: An open and extensible platform to retrieve, visualize and analyze 3D morphology.Methods in ecology and evolution · 2021Article
- Comparing semi-landmarking approaches for analyzing three-dimensional cranial morphology.American journal of physical anthropology · 2021Article
- A Registration and Deep Learning Approach to Automated Landmark Detection for Geometric Morphometrics.Evolutionary biology · 2020Article
- Quantification of gas exchange-related upward motion of the liver during prolonged breathholding-potential reduction of motion artifacts in abdominal MRI.The British journal of radiology · 2020Article
- The effect of automated landmark identification on morphometric analyses.Journal of anatomy · 2019Article
- Mapping genetic variants for cranial vault shape in humans.PloS one · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Laboratory mice are staples for evo/devo and genetics studies. Inbred strains provide a uniform genetic background to manipulate and understand gene-environment interactions, while their crosses have been instrumental in studies of genetic architecture, integration and modularity, and mapping of complex biological traits. Recently, there have been multiple large-scale studies of laboratory mice to further our understanding of the developmental basis, evolution, and genetic control of shape variation in the craniofacial skeleton (i.e. skull and mandible). These experiments typically use micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) to capture the craniofacial phenotype in 3D and rely on manually annotated anatomical landmarks to conduct statistical shape analysis. Although the common choice for imaging modality and phenotyping provides the potential for collaborative research for even larger studies with more statistical power, the investigator (or lab-specific) nature of the data collection hampers these efforts. Investigators are rightly concerned that subtle differences in how anatomical landmarks were recorded will create systematic bias between studies that will eventually influence scientific findings. Even if researchers are willing to repeat landmark annotation on a combined dataset, different lab practices and software choices may create obstacles for standardization beyond the underlying imaging data. Here, we propose a freely available analysis system that could assist in the standardization of micro-CT studies in the mouse. Our proposal uses best practices developed in biomedical imaging and takes advantage of existing open-source software and imaging formats. Our first contribution is the creation of a synthetic template for the adult mouse craniofacial skeleton from 25 inbred strains and five F1 crosses that are widely used in biological research. The template contains a fully segmented cranium, left and right hemi-mandibles, endocranial space, and the first few cervical vertebrae. We have been using this template in our lab to segment and isolate cranial structures in an automated fashion from a mixed population of mice, including craniofacial mutants, aged 4-12.5 weeks. As a secondary contribution, we demonstrate an application of nearly automated shape analysis, using symmetric diffeomorphic image registration. This approach, which we call diGPA, closely approximates the popular generalized Procrustes analysis (GPA) but negates the collection of anatomical landmarks. We achieve our goals by using the open-source advanced normalization tools (ANT) image quantification library, as well as its associated R library (ANTsR) for statistical image analysis. Finally, we make a plea to investigators to commit to using open imaging standards and software in their labs to the extent possible to increase the potential for data exchange and improve the reproducibility of findings. Future work will incorporate more anatomical detail (such as individual cranial bones, turbinals, dentition, middle ear ossicles) and more diversity into the template.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.