Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28656520›Full record

ReviewCurrent urology reports2017

State of the Art for Treatment of Vesicovaginal Fistula.

Rachel A Moses, E Ann Gormley

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current urology reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Vaginal repair of nonradiogenic urogenital fistulas.International urogynecology journal · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Elucidating vaginal fistulas on CT and MRI.Insights into imaging · 2019
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Robot-assisted vesico-vaginal fistula repair: technical nuances.International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Rachel A MosesSection of Urology, Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA.
E Ann GormleySection of Urology, Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA. Elizabeth.Ann.Gormley@hitchcock.org.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVesico-vaginal fistulae (VVF) remain the most prevalent genitourinary fistula detrimentally impacting quality of life. PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW: The purpose of this review is to examine relevant literature on management of VVF. RECENT

findingsObstructed labor is the leading cause of VVF in the developing world with most repairs performed via the transvaginal approach. Conversely, the predominate etiology in industrialized nations is iatrogenic injury with an increasing trend towards abdominal repair via a minimally invasive (laparoscopic and robotic) approach. No studies have compared transvaginal repair to minimally invasive transabdominal approaches. Further, an increasing number of authors have developed algorithms to determine optimum surgical approaches and risk factors for persistent incontinence. As surgeons become more facile with laparoscopic and robotic skills, there is a growing trend for minimally invasive surgical management of VVF in developed countries, perhaps widening the disparity gap between developing nations where transvaginal approaches predominate with good success. Further studies are needed to compare transvaginal to minimally invasive transabdominal approaches.

Indexed as

FemaleHumansLaparoscopyMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresRobotic Surgical ProceduresVesicovaginal FistulaIncontinenceMinimally invasiveRobotic assisted laparoscopicTransabdominal repairTransvaginal repairVesicovaginal fistula

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.