ArticleEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2017
Performance of microbial identification by MALDI-TOF MS and susceptibility testing by VITEK 2 from positive blood cultures after minimal incubation on solid media.
Article in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Rapid Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Using Direct Centrifugation Significantly Reduces Turnaround Time While Maintaining High Diagnostic Accuracy in Bloodstream Infections.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Identification methods as a factor affecting the performance of clinical microbiology laboratories participating in an external quality assessment program: a cross-sectional, retrospective analysis.Journal of medical microbiology · 2024Article
- Evolving strategies in microbe identification-a comprehensive review of biochemical, MALDI-TOF MS and molecular testing methods.The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy · 2024Review
- Combination of MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry and Machine Learning for Rapid Antimicrobial Resistance Screening: The Case ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2021Article
- Modern Blood Culture: Management Decisions and Method Options.Clinics in laboratory medicine · 2020Review
- Assessing impact of MALDI mass spectroscopy on reducing directed antibiotic coverage time for Gram-negative organisms.PloS one · 2020Article
- How small modifications in laboratory workflow of blood cultures can have a significant impact on time to results.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2018Article
- Diagnostic Molecular Microbiology: A 2018 Snapshot.Clinics in laboratory medicine · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bloodstream infections (BSIs) are a leading cause of patient morbidity and mortality. Rapid identification of organisms from BSIs is critical for initiating targeted antimicrobial therapy. Although many methods exist for rapid identification, they do not provide detailed or definitive susceptibility information. We assessed the utility of both the VITEK MS and Bruker Biotyper MALDI-TOF mass spectrometers to identify organisms from a positive blood culture bottle after only 4 h of growth on solid media compared to identification from overnight growth using the VITEK MS. Additionally, we determined whether this limited growth could yield accurate antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) results compared to overnight growth using the VITEK 2 AST system. Overall, identifications using the VITEK MS and Biotyper had agreements of 127/150 (84%) and 133/150 (88%), respectively. For rapid AST, the overall categorical agreement was 1010/1017 (99.3%), where Gram-negative bacteria had concordant results for 743/750 (99.1%) organism-drug combinations and Gram-positive bacteria had concordant results for 265/267 (99.3%). Gram-negative bacteria had 4, 2, and 1 minor, major, and very major discrepancies, respectively, while Gram-positive bacteria had no minor errors, one major, and one very major discrepancy. In conclusion, organisms grown for only 4 h on solid media were accurately identified by MALDI-TOF MS and have concordant phenotypic AST profiles. This method can also be implemented using common commercial instruments, providing a way to improve upon identification and gain detailed susceptibility information without significant additional laboratory costs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.