Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28656161›Full record

ArticleThe archives of bone and joint surgery2017

A Comparison of Patients Absorption Doses with Bone Deformity Due to the EOS Imaging and Digital Radiology.

Seyed Mohammad J Abrisham, Fathollah Bouzarjomehri, Reza Nafisi-Moghadam, Mohammad R Sobhan, Mahdie Gadimi, Fereshte Omidvar

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC
In one paragraph

Article in The archives of bone and joint surgery, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Seyed Mohammad J AbrishamDepartment of Orthopedics, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran.
Fathollah BouzarjomehriDepartment of Orthopedics, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran.
Reza Nafisi-MoghadamDepartment of Orthopedics, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran.
Mohammad R SobhanDepartment of Orthopedics, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran.
Mahdie GadimiDepartment of Orthopedics, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran.
Fereshte OmidvarDepartment of Orthopedics, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran.
Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences and Health Services · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study has aimed to measure the patient dose in entire spine radiography by EOS system in comparison with the digital radiography.

methodsEOS stereo-radiography was used for frontal and lateral view spine imaging in 41 patients in a prospective analytical study. A calibrated dose area product (DAP) meter was used for calibration of the DAP in EOS system. The accuracy and precision of the system was confirmed according to the acceptance testing. The same procedure was used for 18 patients referred for lumbar spine digital radiology (overall 36 images).

resultsAlthough radiation fields in the EOS were almost twice of that in digital radiology, and the average peak tube voltage (kV

conclusionThe patient dose in EOS imaging system was lower in comparison with digital radiology (1/20).

Indexed as

Digital radiographyDose area productDosimetryEOSStereo radiography

Identifiers

PMID28656161
PMCPMC5466858
OpenAlexW2724818430

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.