Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28656141›Full record

Trial reportBioMed research international2017

Protein Supplementation to Augment the Effects of High Intensity Resistance Training in Untrained Middle-Aged Males: The Randomized Controlled PUSH Trial.

Andreas Wittke, Simon von Stengel, Michael Hettchen, Michael Fröhlich, Jürgen Giessing, Michael Lell, Michael Scharf, Michael Bebenek, Matthias Kohl, Wolfgang Kemmler

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BioMed research international, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Andreas WittkeInstitute of Medical Physics, Friedrich-Alexander University of Erlangen-Nürnberg, Henkestraße 91, 91052 Erlangen, Germany.
Simon von StengelInstitute of Medical Physics, Friedrich-Alexander University of Erlangen-Nürnberg, Henkestraße 91, 91052 Erlangen, Germany.
Michael HettchenInstitute of Medical Physics, Friedrich-Alexander University of Erlangen-Nürnberg, Henkestraße 91, 91052 Erlangen, Germany.
Michael FröhlichDepartment of Sports Science, University of Kaiserslautern, Erwin Schrödinger-Straße, 67663 Kaiserslautern, Germany.
Jürgen GiessingInstitute of Sports Science, University of Koblenz-Landau, Fortstraße 7, 76829 Landau, Germany.
Michael LellDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Nürnberg Hospital, PMU, Prof.-Ernst-Nathan-Straße 1, 90419 Nürnberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4800-4428
Michael ScharfDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital of Erlangen, Maximiliansplatz 3, 91054 Erlangen, Germany.
Michael BebenekInstitute of Medical Physics, Friedrich-Alexander University of Erlangen-Nürnberg, Henkestraße 91, 91052 Erlangen, Germany.
Matthias KohlDepartment of Medical and Life Sciences, University of Furtwangen, Jakob-Kienzle-Straße 17, 78054 Villingen-Schwenningen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9514-8910
Wolfgang KemmlerInstitute of Medical Physics, Friedrich-Alexander University of Erlangen-Nürnberg, Henkestraße 91, 91052 Erlangen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3515-0669

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High intensity (resistance exercise) training (HIT) defined as a "single set resistance exercise to muscular failure" is an efficient exercise method that allows people with low time budgets to realize an adequate training stimulus. Although there is an ongoing discussion, recent meta-analysis suggests the significant superiority of multiple set (MST) methods for body composition and strength parameters. The aim of this study is to determine whether additional protein supplementation may increase the effect of a HIT-protocol on body composition and strength to an equal MST-level. One hundred and twenty untrained males 30-50 years old were randomly allocated to three groups: (a) HIT, (b) HIT and protein supplementation (HIT&P), and (c) waiting-control (CG) and (after cross-over) high volume/high-intensity-training (HVHIT). HIT was defined as "single set to failure protocol" while HVHIT consistently applied two equal sets. Protein supplementation provided an overall intake of 1.5-1.7 g/kg/d/body mass. Primary study endpoint was lean body mass (LBM). LBM significantly improved in all exercise groups (

Indexed as

AdultBody CompositionDietary SupplementsExerciseFood HypersensitivityHumansMaleMiddle AgedMuscle, SkeletalMuscle StrengthProteinsResistance TrainingProteins

Identifiers

PMID28656141
PMCPMC5471590

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.