Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28656012›Full record

ReviewThe Yale journal of biology and medicine2017

Pathobiology and Immunobiology of

Sudha Neelam, Jerry Y Niederkorn

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Yale journal of biology and medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Expert review of anti-infective therapy · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Epidemiology of and Genetic Factors Associated withPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Biological characteristics and pathogenicity ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Review
  12. Immunity and pain in the eye: focus on the ocular surface.Clinical and experimental immunology · 2022
    Review
  13. Curcumin effect onPeerJ · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Amoebicidal activity ofParasitology · 2021
    Article
  17. Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. The biology of Acanthamoeba keratitis.Experimental eye research · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sudha NeelamDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.
Jerry Y NiederkornDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.
The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

AcanthamoebaAcanthamoeba KeratitisAdaptive ImmunityAnimalsComplement System ProteinsCorneaDisease Models, AnimalHumansImmunity, InnateImmunity, MucosalRisk FactorsToll-Like ReceptorsComplement System ProteinsToll-Like ReceptorsAcanthamoeba keratitiscorneal pathologymucosal immunityocular immunology

Identifiers

PMID28656012
PMCPMC5482302
OpenAlexW2745067929

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.