Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28655805›Full record

ArticleGlobal health, science and practice2017

Challenges of Implementing Antenatal Ultrasound Screening in a Rural Study Site: A Case Study From the Democratic Republic of the Congo.

David Swanson, Adrien Lokangaka, Melissa Bauserman, Jonathan Swanson, Robert O Nathan, Antoinette Tshefu, Elizabeth M McClure, Carl L Bose, Ana Garces, Sarah Saleem and 3 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global health, science and practice, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The FemTech revolution: Unlocking the potential of new technology for optimizing pregnancy outcomes in low- and middle-income countries and remote areas.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Antenatal Corticosteroids:Global health, science and practice · 2018
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

David SwansonUniversity of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Adrien LokangakaKinshasa School of Public Heath, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo.
Melissa BausermanUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Jonathan SwansonUniversity of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Robert O NathanUniversity of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Antoinette TshefuKinshasa School of Public Heath, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo.
Elizabeth M McClureRTI International, Durham, NC, USA. mcclure@rti.org.
Carl L BoseUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Ana GarcesRTI International, Durham, NC, USA.
Sarah SaleemAga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Elwyn ChombaUniversity of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.
Fabian EsamaiMoi University, Eldoret, Kenya.
Robert L GoldenbergColumbia University, New York, NY, USA.
University of Washington · USRTI International · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USAga Khan University · PKColumbia University · USMoi University · KEUniversity of Zambia · ZM

Funding

Zika in Pregnancy Supplemental Funding requestU01HD040636 · NICHD · RESEARCH TRIANGLE INSTITUTE · PI MCCLURE, ELIZABETH M · 2001 to 2017
$37.5M
UAB/AKU Global Network Research UnitU01HD040607 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI GOLDENBERG, ROBERT L · 2001 to 2012
$8.5M
Complementary feeding: a Global Network cluster randomized controlled trialU01HD040657 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI HAMBIDGE, K MICHAEL · 2001 to 2012
$8.1M
Neonatal Resuscitation in Developing CountriesU01HD043464 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI CARLO FONT, WALDEMAR A. · 2003 to 2012
$6.6M
Global Network for Women's and Children's HealthU01HD058326 · NICHD · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI LIECHTY, EDWARD A. · 2008 to 2012
$3.6M
Columbia University/Aga Khan University Global Network Research UnitU10HD078438 · NICHD · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI GOLDENBERG, ROBERT L · 2013 to 2017
$3.2M
A Strategy to Reduce Stunting of Growth in Early Infancy: a Global Network StudyU10HD076465 · NICHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BOSE, CARL · 2013 to 2017
$2.9M
NICHD NIH HHS U01 HD040607NICHD NIH HHS U01 HD040636NICHD NIH HHS U01 HD040657NICHD NIH HHS U01 HD043464NICHD NIH HHS U01 HD058326NICHD NIH HHS U10 HD076465NICHD NIH HHS U10 HD078438
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Persistent global disparities in maternal and neonatal outcomes and the emergence of compact ultrasound technology as an increasingly viable technology for low-resource settings provided the genesis of the First Look Ultrasound study. Initiated in 2014 in 5 low- and middle-income countries and completed in June 2016, the study's intervention included the training of health personnel to perform antenatal ultrasound screening and to refer women identified with high-risk pregnancies to hospitals for appropriate care. This article examines the challenges that arose in implementing the study, with a particular focus on the site in Equateur Province of the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) where the challenges were greatest and the efforts to meet these challenges most illuminating. During the study period, we determined that with resources and dedicated staff, it was possible to leverage the infrastructure and implement ultrasound at antenatal care across a variety of remote sites, including rural DRC. However, numerous technical and logistical challenges had to be addressed including security of the equipment, electricity requirements, and integration of the intervention into the health system. To address security concerns, in most of the countries field sonographers were hired and dispatched each day with the equipment to the health centers. At the end of each day, the equipment was locked in a secure, central location. To obtain the required power source, the DRC health centers installed solar panels bolted on adjacent poles since the thatch roofs of the centers prohibited secure roof-top installation. To realize the full value of the ultrasound intervention, women screened with high-risk pregnancies had to seek a higher level of care at the referral hospital for a definitive diagnosis and appropriate care. While the study did provide guidance on referral and systems management to health center and hospital administration, the extent to which this resulted in the necessary structural changes varied depending on the motivation of the stakeholders. In order for such an intervention to be scaled up and sustained as part of a health system's general services, it would require considerable effort, political will, and financial and human resources. Preliminary results from the study indicate that taking routine antenatal ultrasound screening to scale is not warranted. Lessons learned in implementing the study, however, can help inform future studies or programs that are considering use of ultrasound or other imaging technology for other applications in low-resource settings.

Indexed as

Ultrasonography, PrenatalDemocratic Republic of the CongoFemaleHealth ResourcesHumansOrganizational Case StudiesPregnancyPrenatal CareRural Health Services

Identifiers

PMID28655805
PMCPMC5487092
OpenAlexW2727054691

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.