Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28655802›Full record

Trial reportGlobal health, science and practice2017

Benefits and Limitations of Text Messages to Stimulate Higher Learning Among Community Providers: Participants' Views of an mHealth Intervention to Support Continuing Medical Education in Vietnam.

Lora L Sabin, Anna Larson Williams, Bao Ngoc Le, Augusta R Herman, Ha Viet Nguyen, Rebecca R Albanese, Wenjun Xiong, Hezekiah Oa Shobiye, Nafisa Halim, Lien Thi Ngoc Tran and 5 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Global health, science and practice, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03346616 (Text4Peds), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03346616 nacompletednot on this map

Text4Peds: Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating Medical Student Education

TypeinterventionalSponsorSt. Louis UniversityRan2016 to 2017Enrolled162ConditionsEducation, Medical, Undergraduate, SMSArmsTexting Group, Non Texting Group
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Lora L SabinCenter for Global Health and Development, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA. lsabin@bu.edu.
Anna Larson WilliamsCenter for Global Health and Development, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Bao Ngoc LePathfinder International in Vietnam, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Augusta R HermanCenter for Global Health and Development, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Ha Viet NguyenCenter for Population Research Information and Databases (CPRID), Ministry of Health, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Rebecca R AlbaneseCenter for Global Health and Development, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Wenjun XiongCenter for Global Health and Development, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Hezekiah Oa ShobiyeCenter for Global Health and Development, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Nafisa HalimCenter for Global Health and Development, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Lien Thi Ngoc TranThái Nguyên Provincial Department of Public Health, Thái Nguyên Province, Vietnam.
Marion McNabbDepartment of Global Health, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Hai HoangThái Nguyên Provincial Department of Public Health, Thái Nguyên Province, Vietnam.
Ariel FalconerCenter for Global Health and Development, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Tam Thi Thanh NguyenCenter for Population Research Information and Databases (CPRID), Ministry of Health, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Christopher J GillCenter for Global Health and Development, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

mCME Delivering continuing medical education to community health workers using cell phonesR21TW009911 · FIC · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI GILL, CHRISTOPHER J · 2014 to 2015
$372k
FIC NIH HHS R21 TW009911
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA randomized controlled trial was conducted in 2015 to evaluate a mobile continuing medical education (mCME) intervention that provided daily text messages to community-based physicians' assistants (CBPAs) in Thai Nguyen Province, Vietnam. Although the intervention failed to improve medical knowledge over a 6-month period, a companion qualitative study provided insights on the views and experiences of intervention participants.

methodsWe conducted focus group discussions (FGDs) and in-depth interviews (IDIs) among participants randomized to receive text messages containing either simple medical facts or quiz questions. Trained interviewers collected data immediately following the conclusion of the trial in December 2015. Using semi-structured question guides, respondents were queried on their views of the intervention, positive and negative, and perceived impacts of the intervention. During analysis, after learning that the intervention had failed to increase knowledge among participants, we also examined reasons for lack of improvement in medical knowledge. All analyses were performed in NVivo using a thematic approach.

resultsA total of 70 CBPAs engaged in one of 8 FGDs or an IDI. One-half were men; average age among all respondents was 40 years. Most (81%) practiced in rural settings and most (51%) focused on general medicine. The mean length of work experience was 3 years. All respondents made positive comments about the intervention; convenience, relevance, and quick feedback (quiz format) were praised. Downsides encompassed lack of depth of information, weak interaction, technology challenges, and challenging/irrelevant messages. Respondents described perceived impacts encompassing increased motivation, knowledge, collegial discussions, Internet use to search for more information, and clinical skills. Overall, they expressed a desire for the intervention to continue and recommended expansion to other medical professionals. Overreliance on the text messages, lack of effective self-study, and technical/language-based barriers may be potential explanations for intervention failure.

conclusionAs a form of mCME, daily text messages were well-received by community-level health care providers in Vietnam. This mCME approach appears very promising in low-resource environments or where traditional forms of CME are impractical. Future models might consider enhancements to foster linkages to relevant medical materials, improve interaction with medical experts, and tailor medical content to the daily activities of medical staff.

Indexed as

TelemedicineText MessagingAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelCommunity Health WorkersEducation, Medical, ContinuingFemaleFocus GroupsHumansLearningMaleMotivationPhysician AssistantsQualitative ResearchVietnam

Identifiers

PMID28655802
PMCPMC5487088

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.