Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28655750›Full record

ArticleThe Plant cell2017

AspWood: High-Spatial-Resolution Transcriptome Profiles Reveal Uncharacterized Modularity of Wood Formation in

David Sundell, Nathaniel R Street, Manoj Kumar, Ewa J Mellerowicz, Melis Kucukoglu, Christoffer Johnsson, Vikash Kumar, Chanaka Mannapperuma, Nicolas Delhomme, Ove Nilsson and 6 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Plant cell, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 135 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
135citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
45.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

135 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 260 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

75 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

David SundellUmeå Plant Science Center, Department of Plant Physiology, Umeå University, 901 87 Umeå, Sweden.
Nathaniel R StreetUmeå Plant Science Center, Department of Plant Physiology, Umeå University, 901 87 Umeå, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6031-005X
Manoj KumarUmeå Plant Science Centre, Department of Forest Genetics and Plant Physiology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 901 87 Umeå, Sweden.
Ewa J MellerowiczUmeå Plant Science Centre, Department of Forest Genetics and Plant Physiology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 901 87 Umeå, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6817-1031
Melis KucukogluUmeå Plant Science Centre, Department of Forest Genetics and Plant Physiology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 901 87 Umeå, Sweden.
Christoffer JohnssonUmeå Plant Science Centre, Department of Forest Genetics and Plant Physiology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 901 87 Umeå, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9854-6938
Vikash KumarUmeå Plant Science Centre, Department of Forest Genetics and Plant Physiology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 901 87 Umeå, Sweden.
Chanaka MannapperumaUmeå Plant Science Center, Department of Plant Physiology, Umeå University, 901 87 Umeå, Sweden.
Nicolas DelhommeUmeå Plant Science Center, Department of Plant Physiology, Umeå University, 901 87 Umeå, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3053-0796
Ove NilssonUmeå Plant Science Centre, Department of Forest Genetics and Plant Physiology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 901 87 Umeå, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1033-1909
Hannele TuominenUmeå Plant Science Center, Department of Plant Physiology, Umeå University, 901 87 Umeå, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4949-3702
Edouard PesquetUmeå Plant Science Center, Department of Plant Physiology, Umeå University, 901 87 Umeå, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6959-3284
Urs FischerUmeå Plant Science Centre, Department of Forest Genetics and Plant Physiology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 901 87 Umeå, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3642-6065
Totte NiittyläUmeå Plant Science Centre, Department of Forest Genetics and Plant Physiology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 901 87 Umeå, Sweden.
Björn SundbergUmeå Plant Science Centre, Department of Forest Genetics and Plant Physiology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 901 87 Umeå, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1801-3873
Torgeir R HvidstenUmeå Plant Science Center, Department of Plant Physiology, Umeå University, 901 87 Umeå, Sweden torgeir.hvidsten@umu.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6097-2539
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences · SEUmeå Plant Science Centre · SEStockholm University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Trees represent the largest terrestrial carbon sink and a renewable source of ligno-cellulose. There is significant scope for yield and quality improvement in these largely undomesticated species, and efforts to engineer elite varieties will benefit from improved understanding of the transcriptional network underlying cambial growth and wood formation. We generated high-spatial-resolution RNA sequencing data spanning the secondary phloem, vascular cambium, and wood-forming tissues of

Indexed as

TranscriptomeCell WallGene Expression Regulation, PlantInternetMeristemPolysaccharidesPopulusWoodXylemPolysaccharides

Identifiers

PMID28655750
PMCPMC5559752
OpenAlexW2727356059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.