Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28655547›Full record

ArticlePreventive medicine2017

Breast cancer screening outreach effectiveness: Mammogram-specific reminders vs. comprehensive preventive services birthday letters.

Diana S M Buist, Hongyuan Gao, Melissa L Anderson, Tracy Onega, Susan Brandzel, Melissa A Rabelhofer, Susan Carol Bradford, Erin J Aiello Bowles

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Preventive medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06305312 (Community Services Navigation to Advance Health Equity in Breast Cancer Screening), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06305312 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Community Services Navigation to Advance Health Equity in Breast Cancer Screening

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of UtahRan2024 to 2028Enrolled1,450ConditionsBreast CancerArmsCommunity Service Navigation, Usual Care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Diana S M BuistKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, 1730 Minor Ave, Suite 1600, Seattle, WA 98101, USA. Electronic address: buist.d@ghc.org.
Hongyuan GaoKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, 1730 Minor Ave, Suite 1600, Seattle, WA 98101, USA. Electronic address: gao.h@ghc.org.
Melissa L AndersonKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, 1730 Minor Ave, Suite 1600, Seattle, WA 98101, USA. Electronic address: Anderson.melissa@ghc.org.
Tracy OnegaGeisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth, 1 Rope Ferry Rd, Hanover, NH 03755, USA. Electronic address: Tracy.l.onega@dartmouth.edu.
Susan BrandzelKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, 1730 Minor Ave, Suite 1600, Seattle, WA 98101, USA; Health Stories Project Insights, 601 Union Street, Suite 4820, Seattle, WA 98101, USA. Electronic address: susan.brandzel@hspinsights.com.
Melissa A RabelhoferKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, 1730 Minor Ave, Suite 1600, Seattle, WA 98101, USA. Electronic address: Rabelhofer.m@ghc.org.
Susan Carol BradfordKaiser Permanente Washington, Clinical Prevention and Improvement, 310 15th Ave E, Seattle, WA 98112, USA. Electronic address: braford.s@ghc.org.
Erin J Aiello BowlesKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, 1730 Minor Ave, Suite 1600, Seattle, WA 98101, USA. Electronic address: bowles.e@ghc.org.

Funding

Risk-based Imaging Strategies to Improve Breast Cancer Surveillance OutcomesP01CA154292 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI Diana L Miglioretti · 2011 to 2026
$52.9M
IMPROVING THE QUALITY OF MAMMOGRAPHIC INTERPRETATIONU01CA063731 · NCI · KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN OF WASHINGTON · PI BUIST, DIANA SM · 1994 to 2011
$6.7M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA154292NCI NIH HHS U01 CA063731
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We compared the effectiveness of two outreach strategies on timely mammography adherence: a mammogram-specific reminder letter (sent just before a woman was due) to a birthday letter (addresses multiple preventive services and not timed around due dates). We evaluated screening mammography adherence following 79,848 mammogram-specific and 151,626 birthday letters mailed between 2002 and 2012 to women aged 40-74years enrolled in Kaiser Permanente Washington. Screening mammogram adherence was specifically tied to due date and was evaluated separately by age group and up-to-date or overdue status at the time of mailing. We used generalized estimating equations to account for correlation between repeated observations, to model the odds of screening mammography adherence by letter type. Among women up-to-date, adherence following birthday letters was 22-76% lower compared to the mammogram-specific reminders, with the greatest decreases in adherence in women aged 70-74. Birthday letters were more effective at activating screening uptake among some subgroups of overdue women aged 50-69 and most overdue women aged 70-74, but universally low adherence rates were observed in overdue women. Increasing number of recommended services for women aged 50-74 who were up-to-date resulted in 12-17% lower mammography adherence, but had no effect in women aged 40-49 or in overdue women. Birthday letters are less effective than mammogram-specific reminder letters at prompting women to undergo timely breast cancer screening, particularly among women up-to-date with screening. Birthday letters may be effective at increasing overall preventive care; however, supplemental outreach may be needed around the due date to increase timely preventive services receipt.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerReminder SystemsAdultAgedAge FactorsBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMammographyMass ScreeningMiddle AgedPostal ServiceWashingtonAdherenceBreast cancer screeningOutreachPreventive carePreventive servicesReminder lettersScreening programs

Identifiers

PMID28655547
PMCPMC5638650

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.