ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2017
Implementing technology in healthcare: insights from physicians.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
56 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The impact of eHealth use on general practice workload in the pre-COVID-19 era: a systematic review.BMC health services research · 2024Pooled it
- Electronic Medication Reconciliation Tools Aimed at Healthcare Professionals to Support Medication Reconciliation: a Systematic Review.Journal of medical systems · 2023Pooled it
- Social, Organizational, and Technological Factors Impacting Clinicians' Adoption of Mobile Health Tools: Systematic Literature Review.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2020Pooled it
- Usability and satisfaction of electronic medical records Interface and its relationship with work design among healthcare professionals at universal health insurance settings in Port Said, Egypt.Health policy OPEN · 2026Article
- First the relationship, then the technology: Healthcare professionals' perceptions on how digital health solutions impact the interaction with patients.PEC innovation · 2026Article
- Unpacking the influence of ICT on respiratory diseases in Sub-Saharan Africa.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Health care management in Africa: a debate for future research and agenda.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- A bibliometric analysis and mapping of global research trends in antihypertensive medication adherence (1975-2024).The Egyptian heart journal : (EHJ) : official bulletin of the Egyptian Society of Cardiology · 2025Review
- Exploring the Associations of Cultural Sensitivity, Technology, and Patient Empowerment with Patient-Centered Care: A Mixed-Methods Study in UAE Rehabilitation Healthcare Centers.Journal of general internal medicine · 2025Article
- A randomized controlled trial to evaluate innovative decision support in the context of fall prevention.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Care in the era of digital health: experiences from Norwegian general practitioners.Scandinavian journal of primary health care · 2025Article
- Mapping Research Trends on the Implications of Telemedicine for Healthcare Professionals: A Comprehensive Bibliometric Analysis.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Usability, acceptance, and the role of realism in virtual humans for breathing exercise training.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Advancing public health through technological rehabilitation: insights from a national clinician survey.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- Practical Recommendations for Navigating Digital Tools in Hospitals: Qualitative Interview Study.JMIR medical education · 2024Article
- Investigating Physicians' Adoption of Telemedicine in Romania Using Technology Acceptance Model (TAM).Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Shaping the future: an Italian survey unveils the unmet need to empower physical medicine and rehabilitation professionals with technological skills.European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine · 2024Article
- Project ECHOBMC health services research · 2024Article
- Physical activity advice given by French general practitioners for low back pain and the role of digital e-health applications: a qualitative study.BMC primary care · 2024Article
- Exploring healthcare providers' perspectives on virtual care delivery: insights into telemedicine services.BMC health services research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTechnology has significantly changed the way health organizations operate. However, the role it plays in healthcare systems remains unclear. This aim of this study was to evaluate the opinion of physicians regarding e-health and determine what factors influence their opinion and describe the advantages, inconveniences and threats they may perceive by its use.
methodsA cross-sectional questionnaire-based study. A questionnaire which had been previously designed and validated by the authors was used to interview physicians from the Barcelona Medical Association. 930 physicians were contacted by phone to participate in the study.
resultsSeven hundred sixty physicians responded to the questionnaire (response rate: 82%). The usefulness of telemedicine scored 7.4 (SD 1.8) on a scale from 1-10 (from the lowest to the highest) and the importance of the Internet in the workplace was 8.2 points (SD 1.8). Therapeutic compliance (7.0 -SD 1.8-) and patient health (7.0 -SD 1.7-) showed the best scores, and there were differences between professionals who had and had not previously participated in a telemedicine project (p < 0.05). The multivariate regression model explained the 41% of the variance for 7 factors: participation in telemedicine project (p < 0.001), quality of clinical practice (p < 0.001), patient health (p < 0.001), professional workload (p = 0.005), ease-of-use of electronic device (p = 0.007), presence of incentives for telemedicine (p = 0.011) and patient preference for in-person visits (p = 0.05).
conclusionsPhysicians believe in the usefulness of e-health. Professionals with previous experience with it are more open to its implementation and consider that the benefits of technology outweigh its possible difficulties and shortcomings. Physicians demanded projects with appropriate funding and technology, as well as specific training to improve their technological abilities. The relationship of users with technology differs according to their personal or professional life. Although a 2.0 philosophy has been incorporated into many aspects of our lives, healthcare systems still have a long way to go in order to adapt to this new understanding of the relationship between patients and their health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.