ArticleJAMA internal medicine2017
Cardiovascular Testing and Clinical Outcomes in Emergency Department Patients With Chest Pain.
Article in JAMA internal medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
35 citing papers in PubMed.
- The HEART Pathway Randomized Controlled Trial One-year Outcomes.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2019Trial
- Using Machine Learning to Risk Stratify Emergency Department Patients With Chest Pain but No Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Multicenter Retrospective Analysis.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Article
- Cost-effectiveness of early noninvasive cardiac testing for suspected acute coronary syndrome.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2025Article
- Clinical Outcomes, Healthcare Utilization, and Cost Following Implementation of a High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin Assay.Clinical cardiology · 2025Article
- A Study on the Association Between Risk Factors and Psychosocial Factors of Non-Cardiac Chest Pain (NCCP) in Adults Aged 40 and Above Based on 2013-2018 US NHANES Data.Journal of pain research · 2025Article
- Review
- Cardiac Computed Tomography Angiography in the Evaluation of Coronary Artery Disease: An Interventional Perspective.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2024Review
- Assessment of Price Variation in Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery at US Hospitals.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2024Article
- Sex-disparities in chest pain workup: a retrospective cohort review of a university based clinical decision pathway.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2023Article
- HEART Score and Its Implementation in Emergency Medicine Departments in the West Balkan Region-A Pilot Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Observational
- Association of Bariatric Surgery With Cardiovascular Outcomes in Adults With Severe Obesity and Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease.JAMA network open · 2022Article
- Surgical Treatment for Empyema Thoracis: Prognostic Role of Preoperative Transthoracic Echocardiography and Serum Calcium.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Article
- Major adverse cardiac event rates in moderate-risk patients: Does prior coronary disease matter?Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2022Article
- Does Hospital Admission/Observation for Chest Pain Improve Patient Outcomes after Emergency Department Evaluation for Suspected Acute Coronary Syndrome?Journal of general internal medicine · 2022Article
- Scoring systems for the triage and assessment of short-term cardiovascular risk in patients with acute chest pain.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2021Review
- 30 day predicted outcome in undifferentiated chest pain: multicenter validation of the HEART score in Tunisian population.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2021Article
- Graded Coronary Risk Stratification for Emergency Department Patients With Chest Pain: A Controlled Cohort Study.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2021Article
- The ethical dilemma of emergency department patients with low-risk chest pain.Emergency medicine journal : EMJ · 2021Article
- Impact of High-Deductible Health Plans on Emergency Department Patients With Nonspecific Chest Pain and Their Subsequent Care.Circulation · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Noninvasive testing and coronary angiography are used to evaluate patients who present to the emergency department (ED) with chest pain, but their effects on outcomes are uncertain. Objective: To determine whether cardiovascular testing-noninvasive imaging or coronary angiography-is associated with changes in the rates of coronary revascularization or acute myocardial infarction (AMI) admission in patients who present to the ED with chest pain without initial findings of ischemia. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort analysis used weekday (Monday-Thursday) vs weekend (Friday-Sunday) presentation as an instrument to adjust for unobserved case-mix variation (selection bias) between 2011 and 2012. National claims data (Truven MarketScan) was used. The data included a total of 926 633 privately insured patients ages 18 to 64 years who presented to the ED with chest pain without initial diagnosis consistent with acute ischemia. Exposures: Noninvasive testing or coronary angiography within 2 days or 30 days of presentation. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end points were coronary revascularization (percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass graft surgery) and AMI admission at 7, 30, 180, and 365 days. The secondary end points were coronary angiography and coronary artery bypass grafting in those who underwent angiography. Results: The patients were ages 18 to 64 years with an average age of 44.4 years. A total of 536 197 patients (57.9%) were women. Patients who received testing (224 973) had increased risk at baseline and had greater risk of AMI admission than those who did not receive testing (701 660) (0.35% vs 0.14% at 30 days). Weekday patients (571 988) had similar baseline comorbidities to weekend patients (354 645) but were more likely to receive testing. After risk factor adjustment, testing within 30 days was associated with a significant increase in coronary angiography (36.5 per 1000 patients tested; 95% CI, 21.0-52.0) and revascularization (22.8 per 1000 patients tested; 95% CI, 10.6-35.0) at 1 year but no significant change in AMI admissions (7.8 per 1000 patients tested; 95% CI, -1.4 to 17.0). Testing within 2 days was also associated with a significant increase in coronary revascularization but no difference in AMI admissions. Conclusions and Relevance: Cardiac testing in patients with chest pain was associated with increased downstream testing and treatment without a reduction in AMI admissions, suggesting that routine testing may not be warranted. Further research into whether specific high-risk subgroups benefit from testing is needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.