Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28654959›Full record

ArticleJAMA internal medicine2017

Cardiovascular Testing and Clinical Outcomes in Emergency Department Patients With Chest Pain.

Alexander T Sandhu, Paul A Heidenreich, Jay Bhattacharya, M Kate Bundorf

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA internal medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The HEART Pathway Randomized Controlled Trial One-year Outcomes.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2019
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Cost-effectiveness of early noninvasive cardiac testing for suspected acute coronary syndrome.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Major adverse cardiac event rates in moderate-risk patients: Does prior coronary disease matter?Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alexander T SandhuVeterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California.
Paul A HeidenreichVeterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California.
Jay BhattacharyaCenter for Health Policy and Center for Primary Care and Outcomes Research, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
M Kate BundorfStanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Noninvasive testing and coronary angiography are used to evaluate patients who present to the emergency department (ED) with chest pain, but their effects on outcomes are uncertain. Objective: To determine whether cardiovascular testing-noninvasive imaging or coronary angiography-is associated with changes in the rates of coronary revascularization or acute myocardial infarction (AMI) admission in patients who present to the ED with chest pain without initial findings of ischemia. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort analysis used weekday (Monday-Thursday) vs weekend (Friday-Sunday) presentation as an instrument to adjust for unobserved case-mix variation (selection bias) between 2011 and 2012. National claims data (Truven MarketScan) was used. The data included a total of 926 633 privately insured patients ages 18 to 64 years who presented to the ED with chest pain without initial diagnosis consistent with acute ischemia. Exposures: Noninvasive testing or coronary angiography within 2 days or 30 days of presentation. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end points were coronary revascularization (percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass graft surgery) and AMI admission at 7, 30, 180, and 365 days. The secondary end points were coronary angiography and coronary artery bypass grafting in those who underwent angiography. Results: The patients were ages 18 to 64 years with an average age of 44.4 years. A total of 536 197 patients (57.9%) were women. Patients who received testing (224 973) had increased risk at baseline and had greater risk of AMI admission than those who did not receive testing (701 660) (0.35% vs 0.14% at 30 days). Weekday patients (571 988) had similar baseline comorbidities to weekend patients (354 645) but were more likely to receive testing. After risk factor adjustment, testing within 30 days was associated with a significant increase in coronary angiography (36.5 per 1000 patients tested; 95% CI, 21.0-52.0) and revascularization (22.8 per 1000 patients tested; 95% CI, 10.6-35.0) at 1 year but no significant change in AMI admissions (7.8 per 1000 patients tested; 95% CI, -1.4 to 17.0). Testing within 2 days was also associated with a significant increase in coronary revascularization but no difference in AMI admissions. Conclusions and Relevance: Cardiac testing in patients with chest pain was associated with increased downstream testing and treatment without a reduction in AMI admissions, suggesting that routine testing may not be warranted. Further research into whether specific high-risk subgroups benefit from testing is needed.

Indexed as

Chest PainCoronary AngiographyElectrocardiographyMyocardial InfarctionAdultCaliforniaCoronary Artery BypassDiagnostic Tests, RoutineEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHospitalizationHumansMaleMiddle AgedOutcome and Process Assessment, Health CarePercutaneous Coronary Intervention

Identifiers

PMID28654959
PMCPMC5710427

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.