Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28654823›Full record

ArticleSocial science & medicine (1982)2017

Supporting the role of community members employed as research staff: Perspectives of community researchers working in addiction research.

Gala True, Leslie B Alexander, Celia B Fisher

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Social science & medicine (1982), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Meta-Research on the Science of Lived Experience Engagement in Mental Health and Substance Use Health Research: A Scoping Review and Qualitative Synthesis.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  3. Developing an implementation fidelity measure for a family healthy weight program.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Community Partnership Guide for Engaging with Academic Researchers.Progress in community health partnerships : research, education, and action · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Gala TrueAssociate Professor, Section of General Internal Medicine & Geriatrics, Tulane University School of Medicine, Core Investigator, South Central Mental Illness Research Education and Clinical Center, Southeast Louisiana Veterans Healthcare System, 1555 Poydras St. Room 827, New Orleans LA 70112, United States. Electronic address: Jennifer.True2@va.gov.
Leslie B AlexanderMary Hale Chase Chair in the Social Sciences and Social Work Research and Professor, Graduate School of Social Work and Social Research, 300 Airdale Rd, Bryn Mawr, PA 19010, United States. Electronic address: lalexand@brynmawr.edu.
Celia B FisherMarie Ward Doty University Chair in Ethics, Director, Center for Ethics Education and Professor, Department of Psychology, Fordham University, 441 East Fordham Road, Dealy Hall, Room 117, Bronx, NY 10458, United States. Electronic address: fisher@fordham.edu.

Funding

Ethical Challenges for Research Extenders Responsible for the Integrity of CommunR21RR026302 · NCRR · FORDHAM UNIVERSITY · PI FISHER, CELIA B · 2009 to 2010
$408k
Communicating the Impact of mTBI on Post-Deployment Reintegration using PhotovoiceI01HX001713 · VA · SOUTHEAST LOUISIANA VETERANS HEALTH CARE · PI TRUE, JENNIFER GALA · 2018 to 2019
–
HSRD VA I01 HX001713NCRR NIH HHS R21 RR026302
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Community researchers are laypersons who conduct research activities in their own communities. In addiction and HIV research, community researchers are valued for their insider status and knowledge. At the same time, their presence on the research team raises concerns about coercion and confidentiality when community researchers and participants know each other personally, and the work of navigating between the worlds of research and community leads to moral distress and burnout for some community researchers. In this paper, we draw upon the concept of 'moral experience' to explore the local moral worlds of community researchers in the context of addiction research. In February and March 2010, we conducted focus groups with 36 community researchers employed on community-based addiction studies in the United States to elicit perspectives on ethical and moral challenges they face in their work and insights on best practices to support their role in research. Community researchers described how their values were realized or thwarted in the context of research, and their strategies for coping with shifting identities and competing priorities. They delineated how their knowledge could be used to inform development of research protocols and help principal investigators build and maintain trust with the community researchers on their teams. Our findings contribute to current understandings of the moral experiences of community members employed in research, and inform policies and practices for the growing field of community-engaged research. Funders, research organizations, and research ethics boards should develop guidelines and standards to ensure studies have key resources in place to support community researchers and ensure quality and integrity of community-engaged work. Investigators who work with community researchers should ensure channels for frontline staff to provide input on research protocols and to create an atmosphere where challenges and concerns can be openly and safely discussed.

Indexed as

PerceptionAddiction MedicineCommunity-Based Participatory ResearchEmploymentFocus GroupsHumansQualitative ResearchResearch PersonnelSubstance-Related DisordersTrustUnited StatesWorkforceAddiction researchCommunity based researchCommunity engaged researchCommunity researchersHIV/AIDS researchMoral experienceResearch ethicsUnited States

Identifiers

PMID28654823
PMCPMC5554448

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.