Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28654672›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Cost-effectiveness analysis of oral fentanyl formulations for breakthrough cancer pain treatment.

Paolo Angelo Cortesi, Lucia Sara D'Angiolella, Renato Vellucci, Massimo Allegri, Giuseppe Casale, Carlo Favaretti, Flavia Kheiraoui, Giancarlo Cesana, Lorenzo Giovanni Mantovani

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Paolo Angelo CortesiResearch Centre on Public Health (CESP), University of Milan-Bicocca, Monza, Italy.
Lucia Sara D'AngiolellaResearch Centre on Public Health (CESP), University of Milan-Bicocca, Monza, Italy.
Renato VellucciPalliative Care and Pain Therapy Unit, University Hospital of Careggi, Florence, Italy.
Massimo AllegriDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Anesthesia Intensive Care and Pain Therapy Service, Azienda Ospedaliera, University of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Giuseppe CasaleANTEA Center, Antea Formad Educational, Rome, Italy.
Carlo FavarettiInstitute of Public Health, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy.
Flavia KheiraouiInstitute of Public Health, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy.
Giancarlo CesanaResearch Centre on Public Health (CESP), University of Milan-Bicocca, Monza, Italy.
Lorenzo Giovanni MantovaniResearch Centre on Public Health (CESP), University of Milan-Bicocca, Monza, Italy.
University of Milano-Bicocca · ITUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · ITANT Foundation Italy Onlus · ITAzienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi · ITOspedale di Parma · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breakthrough cancer Pain (BTcP) has a high prevalence in cancer population. Patients with BTcP reported relevant health care costs and poor quality of life. The study assessed the cost-effectiveness of the available Oral Fentanyl Formulations (OFFs) for BTcP in Italy. A decision-analytical model was developed to estimate costs and benefits associated with treatments, from the Italian NHS perspective. Expected reductions in pain intensity per BTcP episodes were translated into, percentage of BTcP reduction, resource use and Quality-Adjusted-Life-Years (QALYs). Relative efficacy, resources used and unit costs data were derived from the literature and validated by clinical experts. Probabilistic and deterministic sensitivity analyses were performed. At base-case analysis, Sublingual Fentanyl Citrate (FCSL) compared to other oral formulations reported a lower patient's cost (€1,960.8) and a higher efficacy (18.7% of BTcP avoided and 0.0507 QALYs gained). The sensitivity analyses confirmed the main results in all tested scenarios, with the highest impact reported by BTcP duration and health care resources consumption parameters. Between OFFs, FCSL is the cost-effective option due to faster reduction of pain intensity. However, new research is needed to better understand the economic and epidemiologic impact of BTcP, and to collect more robust data on economic and quality of life impact of the different fentanyl formulations. Different fentanyl formulations are available to manage BTcP in cancer population. The study is the first that assesses the different impact in terms of cost and effectiveness of OFFs, providing new information to better allocate the resources available to treat BTcP and highlighting the need of better data.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeAdministration, OralAdministration, SublingualAnalgesics, OpioidBreakthrough PainCancer PainCost-Benefit AnalysisFentanylHumansItalyModels, TheoreticalPain ManagementQuality-Adjusted Life YearsAnalgesics, OpioidFentanyl

Identifiers

PMID28654672
PMCPMC5487011
OpenAlexW2726253302

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.