Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28654647›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Ancient female philopatry, asymmetric male gene flow, and synchronous population expansion support the influence of climatic oscillations on the evolution of South American sea lion (Otaria flavescens).

Larissa Rosa de Oliveira, Marcelo C M Gehara, Lúcia D Fraga, Fernando Lopes, Juan Ignacio Túnez, Marcelo H Cassini, Patricia Majluf, Susana Cárdenas-Alayza, Héctor J Pavés, Enrique Alberto Crespo and 10 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 13 institutions in 6 countries.

Larissa Rosa de OliveiraLaboratório de Ecologia de Mamíferos, Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos, São Leopoldo, RS, Brazil.
Marcelo C M GeharaHerpetology, American Museum of Natural History, New York, NY, United States of America.
Lúcia D FragaLaboratório de Ecologia de Mamíferos, Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos, São Leopoldo, RS, Brazil.
Fernando LopesLaboratório de Ecologia de Mamíferos, Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos, São Leopoldo, RS, Brazil.
Juan Ignacio TúnezGrupo GEMA, Departamento de Ciencias Básicas, Universidad Nacional de Luján and CONICET, Luján, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Marcelo H CassiniGrupo GEMA, Departamento de Ciencias Básicas, Universidad Nacional de Luján and CONICET, Luján, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Patricia MajlufCentro para la Sostenibilidad Ambiental / Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Perú.
Susana Cárdenas-AlayzaCentro para la Sostenibilidad Ambiental / Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Perú.
Héctor J PavésDepartamento de Ciencias Básica, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Santo Tomas, Osorno, Chile.
Enrique Alberto CrespoLaboratorio de Mamíferos Marinos, Centro para el Estudio de los Sistemas Marinos (CENPAT-CONICET), Puerto Madryn, Chubut, Argentina.
Nestor GarcíaLaboratorio de Mamíferos Marinos, Centro para el Estudio de los Sistemas Marinos (CENPAT-CONICET), Puerto Madryn, Chubut, Argentina.
Rocío Loizaga de CastroLaboratorio de Mamíferos Marinos, Centro para el Estudio de los Sistemas Marinos (CENPAT-CONICET), Puerto Madryn, Chubut, Argentina.
A Rus HoelzelDepartment of Biosciences, Durham University, Durham, United Kingdom.
Maritza SepúlvedaCentro de Investigación y Gestión de los Recursos Naturales, Instituto de Biología, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Valparaíso, Valparaíso, Chile.
Carlos OlavarríaCentro de Estudios Avanzados en Zonas Aridas, La Serena, Chile.
Victor Hugo ValiatiLaboratório de Biologia Molecular, Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos, São Leopoldo, RS, Brazil.
Renato QuiñonesInterdisciplinary Center for Aquaculture Research (FONDAP), Universidad de Concepción, Concepción, Chile.
Maria Jose Pérez-AlvarezInstituto de Ecología y Biodiversidad, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Paulo Henrique OttGrupo de Estudos de Mamíferos Aquáticos do Rio Grande do Sul, Osório, RS, Brazil.
Sandro L BonattoFaculdade de Biociências, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0064-467X
Centro Científico Tecnológico Patagónico · ARPontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul · BRConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas · ARUniversidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos · BRUniversidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia · PEAmerican Museum of Natural History · USCentro de Recursos Educativos Avanzados · CLDurham University · GBInstitute of Ecology and Biodiversity · CLUniversidade Estadual do Rio Grande do Sul · BRUniversidad Santo Tomás · CLUniversity of Concepción · CLUniversity of Valparaíso · CL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The South American sea lion (Otaria flavescens) is widely distributed along the southern Atlantic and Pacific coasts of South America with a history of significant commercial exploitation. We aimed to evaluate the population genetic structure and the evolutionary history of South American sea lion along its distribution by analyses of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) and 10 nuclear microsatellites loci. We analyzed 147 sequences of mtDNA control region and genotyped 111 individuals of South American sea lion for 10 microsatellite loci, representing six populations (Peru, Northern Chile, Southern Chile, Uruguay (Brazil), Argentina and Falkland (Malvinas) Islands) and covering the entire distribution of the species. The mtDNA phylogeny shows that haplotypes from the two oceans comprise two very divergent clades as observed in previous studies, suggesting a long period (>1 million years) of low inter-oceanic female gene flow. Bayesian analysis of bi-parental genetic diversity supports significant (but less pronounced than mitochondrial) genetic structure between Pacific and Atlantic populations, although also suggested some inter-oceanic gene flow mediated by males. Higher male migration rates were found in the intra-oceanic population comparisons, supporting very high female philopatry in the species. Demographic analyses showed that populations from both oceans went through a large population expansion ~10,000 years ago, suggesting a very similar influence of historical environmental factors, such as the last glacial cycle, on both regions. Our results support the proposition that the Pacific and Atlantic populations of the South American sea lion should be considered distinct evolutionarily significant units, with at least two managements units in each ocean.

Indexed as

Gene FlowAnimal MigrationAnimalsDNA, MitochondrialFemaleGenetics, PopulationGenetic VariationMaleOceans and SeasPhylogenyPopulation DynamicsSea LionsSouth AmericaDNA, Mitochondrial

Identifiers

PMID28654647
PMCPMC5487037
OpenAlexW2727525767

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.