Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28654642›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Monitoring of noble, signal and narrow-clawed crayfish using environmental DNA from freshwater samples.

Sune Agersnap, William Brenner Larsen, Steen Wilhelm Knudsen, David Strand, Philip Francis Thomsen, Martin Hesselsøe, Peter Bondgaard Mortensen, Trude Vrålstad, Peter Rask Møller

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
10.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 102 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. An eDNA-based assessment ofEcology and evolution · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Exploration of Environmental DNA (eDNA) to Detect Kirtland's Snake (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Sune AgersnapSection for Evolutionary Genomics, Natural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 15, Copenhagen Ø, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9193-8069
William Brenner LarsenSection for Evolutionary Genomics, Natural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 15, Copenhagen Ø, Denmark.
Steen Wilhelm KnudsenSection for Evolutionary Genomics, Natural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 15, Copenhagen Ø, Denmark.
David StrandNorwegian Veterinary Institute, Sentrum, Oslo, Norway.
Philip Francis ThomsenCentre for GeoGenetics, Natural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, Øster Voldgade 5-7, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Martin HesselsøeAmphi Consult ApS, Niels Jernes Vej 10, Aalborg Øst, Denmark.
Peter Bondgaard MortensenEurofins Miljø A/S, Ladelundsvej 85, Vejen, Denmark.
Trude VrålstadNorwegian Veterinary Institute, Sentrum, Oslo, Norway.
Peter Rask MøllerSection for Evolutionary Genomics, Natural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 15, Copenhagen Ø, Denmark.
University of Copenhagen · DKNorwegian Veterinary Institute · NOEurofins (Denmark) · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For several hundred years freshwater crayfish (Crustacea-Decapoda-Astacidea) have played an important ecological, cultural and culinary role in Scandinavia. However, many native populations of noble crayfish Astacus astacus have faced major declines during the last century, largely resulting from human assisted expansion of non-indigenous signal crayfish Pacifastacus leniusculus that carry and transmit the crayfish plague pathogen. In Denmark, also the non-indigenous narrow-clawed crayfish Astacus leptodactylus has expanded due to anthropogenic activities. Knowledge about crayfish distribution and early detection of non-indigenous and invasive species are crucial elements in successful conservation of indigenous crayfish. The use of environmental DNA (eDNA) extracted from water samples is a promising new tool for early and non-invasive detection of species in aquatic environments. In the present study, we have developed and tested quantitative PCR (qPCR) assays for species-specific detection and quantification of the three above mentioned crayfish species on the basis of mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase 1 (mtDNA-CO1), including separate assays for two clades of A. leptodactylus. The limit of detection (LOD) was experimentally established as 5 copies/PCR with two different approaches, and the limit of quantification (LOQ) were determined to 5 and 10 copies/PCR, respectively, depending on chosen approach. The assays detected crayfish in natural freshwater ecosystems with known populations of all three species, and show promising potentials for future monitoring of A. astacus, P. leniusculus and A. leptodactylus. However, the assays need further validation with data 1) comparing traditional and eDNA based estimates of abundance, and 2) representing a broader geographical range for the involved crayfish species.

Indexed as

Introduced SpeciesAnimalsAstacoideaConservation of Natural ResourcesDNAEcosystemEnvironmental MonitoringFresh WaterScandinavian and Nordic CountriesDNA

Identifiers

PMID28654642
PMCPMC5487031
OpenAlexW2724237167

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.