Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28654574›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of clinical oncology2018

Capecitabine and Celecoxib as a Promising Therapy for Thymic Neoplasms.

Kevin Wood, Elizabeth Byron, Linda Janisch, Ravi Salgia, Manish R Sharma

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of clinical oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01705106 (A Drug-drug Interaction Study of Capecitabine and Celecoxib in Patients With Advanced Solid Malignancies), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01705106 phase1terminatednot on this map

A Drug-drug Interaction Study of Capecitabine and Celecoxib in Patients With Advanced Solid Malignancies

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of ChicagoRan2012 to 2016Enrolled21ConditionsUnspecified Adult Solid Tumor, Protocol SpecificArmscapecitabine, celecoxib, pharmacological study, laboratory biomarker analysis, pharmacogenomic studies
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kevin WoodDepartment of Medicine.
Elizabeth ByronFlorida Cancer Specialists and Research Institute, West Palm Beach, FL.
Linda JanischDepartment of Medicine.
Ravi SalgiaDepartment of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research, City of Hope, and Beckman Research Institute, Duarte, CA.
Manish R SharmaDepartment of Medicine.
Beckman Research InstituteFlorida Cancer Specialists & Research Institute · USUniversity of Chicago · US

Funding

VIRAL ONCOLOGY CORE FACILITYP30CA014599 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI MARK W. LINGEN · 1985 to 2026
$122.1M
Transgenic Mouse FacilityP30CA033572 · NCI · CITY OF HOPE/BECKMAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI STANLEY R. HAMILTON · 1985 to 2026
$86.3M
Developing an Oncology Workforce for the 21st Century - Renewal 01K12CA139160 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI OLOPADE, OLUFUNMILAYO F., SMITH, SONALI · 2010 to 2024
$10.6M
NCI NIH HHS K12 CA139160NCI NIH HHS P30 CA014599NCI NIH HHS P30 CA033572
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesFor patients with unresectable or metastatic thymic epithelial neoplasms, few therapy options are available and outcomes are poor. This case series demonstrates that the combination of capecitabine and celecoxib may be a promising therapeutic option for these patients. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe current report describes the outcomes of 5 patients with thymic neoplasms treated on a drug-drug interaction study of capecitabine and celecoxib in patients with advanced solid malignancies (NCT01705106) conducted at the University of Chicago, plus a sixth patient treated with the same regimen outside of the protocol.

resultsSix patients with thymic neoplasms were treated with capecitabine 1000 mg/m twice daily and celecoxib 200 mg twice daily, day 1 to day 14 on a 21-day cycle. This included 3 patients with thymic carcinoma, 1 with thymic neuroendocrine tumor, and 2 with thymomas. Objective response rates were noted in 3 of 6 patients. Two of the 3 thymic carcinoma patients had complete responses, and the third had a partial response. Best response for the other patients included stable disease for both thymoma patients and progressive disease for the thymic neuroendocrine patient. Other than grade 3 palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia, which developed in 4 of 6 patients and required dose reductions, the regimen was well tolerated.

conclusionsThis case series suggests that capecitabine plus celecoxib may be an effective and well-tolerated treatment option for patients with thymic carcinoma. Further studies should be carried out to establish the efficacy of capecitabine plus celecoxib in thymic carcinoma, and to determine whether monotherapy with capecitabine would be similarly effective.

Indexed as

AgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCapecitabineCelecoxibFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMaximum Tolerated DoseMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPrognosisSurvival RateThymus NeoplasmsCapecitabineCelecoxib

Identifiers

PMID28654574
PMCPMC5743778
OpenAlexW2725438783

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.