Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28654566›Full record

ArticleNursing research

Prospective State and Trait Predictors of Daily Medication Adherence Behavior in HIV.

Paul F Cook, Sarah J Schmiege, Whitney Starr, Jane M Carrington, Lucy Bradley-Springer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Motivation as a Mechanism for Daily Experiences' Effects on HIV Medication Adherence.The Journal of the Association of Nurses in AIDS Care : JANAC
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Paul F CookPaul F. Cook, PhD, is Associate Professor; and Sarah J. Schmiege, PhD, is Associate Professor, University of Colorado College of Nursing, Aurora. Whitney Starr, MSN, NP, is Instructor, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora. Jane M. Carrington, PhD, RN, is Assistant Professor, University of Arizona College of Nursing, Tucson. Lucy Bradley-Springer, PhD, FAAN, ACRN, is Associate Professor Emeritus, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora.
Sarah J Schmiege
Whitney Starr
Jane M Carrington
Lucy Bradley-Springer

Funding

CTSA INFRASTRUCTURE FOR PEDIATRIC RESEARCHUL1RR025780 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI SOKOL, RONALD J. · 2008 to 2011
$61.3M
Explaining Individual Variability in Antiretroviral Adherence BehaviorR21NR012918 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI COOK, PAUL F. · 2012 to 2013
$413k
NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR025780NINR NIH HHS R21 NR012918
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany persons living with HIV (PLWH) are nonadherent to medication. Trait level measures that ask about predictors of adherence in the abstract may not adequately capture state level daily variability that more directly impacts adherence.

objectivesThis preliminary study was designed to test six predictors of electronically monitored adherence at both the state and trait levels and to compare their relative effects.

methodsUsing a smartphone, 87 PLWH completed randomly cued daily surveys on thoughts, mood, stress, coping, social support, and treatment motivation. All participants also completed baseline surveys on each construct. These state and trait variables were tested as prospective predictors of next-day adherence in multilevel models, and their relative importance was quantified. The analysis sample consisted of 53 PLWH who stored their most frequent antiretroviral medication in a bottle that time-stamped openings to measure adherence.

resultsHigher state level motivation, OR = 1.55, 95% CI [1.07, 2.24], and negative mood, OR = 1.33, 95% CI [1.07, 1.63], predicted greater adherence the following day. Importantly, these effects were only found at the state level. Trait level control beliefs predicted greater adherence, OR = 1.65, 95% CI [1.17, 2.35], but contrary to prediction, validated trait level measures of mood, stress, coping, social support, and motivation did not. DISCUSSION: Trait and state level measures predicted adherence, but there were differences between them. Motivation for treatment and negative mood predicted adherence when measured the preceding day, but not as aggregate measures. At the trait level, only control beliefs predicted adherence. Researchers should consider state level variations in mood and motivation as possible explanations for nonadherence. Interventions could be developed to target state level variables.

Indexed as

MotivationAdultDrug MonitoringFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansMaleMedication AdherenceMiddle AgedPatient ComplianceProspective StudiesSmartphoneSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID28654566
PMCPMC5488695

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.