Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28654556›Full record

Trial reportThe Clinical journal of pain2018

Patient-controlled Intravenous Analgesia With Combination of Dexmedetomidine and Sufentanil on Patients After Abdominal Operation: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Blinded, Multicenter Clinical Study.

Yongtao Gao, Xiaoming Deng, Hongbing Yuan, Yufang Leng, Tiezheng Zhang, Xuzhong Xu, Suming Tian, Jun Fang, Wen Ouyang, Xinming Wu

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Clinical journal of pain, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04791059 (Low-dose S-ketamine and Dexmedetomidine in Combination With Opioids for Patient-controlled Analgesia After Scoliosis Correction Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 27 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04791059 phase4completednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Low-dose S-ketamine and Dexmedetomidine in Combination With Opioids for Patient-controlled Analgesia After Scoliosis Correction Surgery: a Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorPeking University First HospitalRan2021 to 2022Enrolled200ConditionsScoliosis Correction, Postoperative Analgesia, S-ketamine, DexmedetomidineArmsS-ketamine, Dexmedetomidine, Sufentanil
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Effect of Dexmedetomidine on the EDDrug design, development and therapy · 2025
    Trial
  12. Association among rescue neuroleptic use, agitation, and perceived comfort: secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial on agitated delirium.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021
    Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Mechanism, Dose, and Administration of Dexmedetomidine in Managing Visceral Pain Associated With Surgery: A Narrative Review.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.

Yongtao GaoAffiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong.
Xiaoming DengShanghai Changhai Hospital.
Hongbing YuanShanghai Changzheng Hospital, Shanghai.
Yufang LengThe First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou.
Tiezheng ZhangThe General Hospital of Shenyang Military, Shenyang.
Xuzhong XuThe First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou.
Suming TianSir Run Shaw Hospital School of Medicine, Zhejiang University.
Jun FangZhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou.
Wen OuyangThe Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha.
Xinming WuPeking University First Hospital, Beijing, P.R. China.
Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University · CNCentral South University · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University · CNGeneral Hospital of Shenyang Military Region · CNLanzhou University · CNNantong University · CNPeking University · CNSecond Military Medical University · CNShanghai Changzheng Hospital · CNSir Run Run Shaw Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo investigate the effect of combination of dexmedetomidine and sufentanil on patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) in patients after abdominal operation and to assess the safety and validity of this treatment.

methodsThis is a prospective, randomized controlled, blinded, multicenter clinical study. A total of 210 patients from 9 clinical research centers underwent selective abdominal operation with general anesthesia were enrolled in the study, including laparoscopic-assisted abdominal operation on stomach, intestines or open surgery on stomach, intestines, kidneys and liver, the American Society of Anesthesiologists status I to II. Patients were randomly assigned into 2 groups: control group (group C) sufentanil 100 μg+normal saline 100 mL in total and test group (group D) sufentanil 100 μg+ dexmedetomidine 200 μg+normal saline 100 mL in total. PCIA was set as follow: background infusion of sufentanil 2 μg/h, bolus dose of sufentanil 2 μg, lockout interval 5 minutes. Main measure indices were analgesic consumption, pressing times and effective pressing times of analgesic pump, usage count, and consumption of remedy drug. Validity indices were visual analog scale (VAS) scores and patient satisfaction. Drug safety indices were hemodynamic parameters, drug side effects, and anal exhaust time.

resultsIn total, 203 cases were analyzed. Seven cases were eliminated for incomplete data record. The total consumption of sufentanil (μg) in 24 hours after operation of group C and group D were 56.9±21.5 and 49.8±15.5, respectively, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Pressing times of analgesic pump in 24 hours after operation of group C and group D were 9.47±16.07 and 5.02±5.56 times, respectively, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Effective pressing times of analgesic pump in 24 hours after operation of group C and group D were 7.8±9.7 and 4.57±5.02 times, respectively, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Resting VAS scores and movement VAS scores at 2, 4, 8, and 24 hours postoperatively were statistically different (P<0.05). Usage times of rescue drug (pethidine) of group C and group D were 9 and 1, mean rank 118.13 and 85.71, respectively, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Mean rank of general satisfaction of group C and group D were 98.99 and 105.04, respectively, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Incidence rate of nausea in group C and group D within 24 hours after surgery was 25% and 12.5%, and of vomiting 18.2% and 6.25%, respectively and of vomiting and the difference was statistically significant.

conclusionsCompared with sufentanil PCIA alone, the combination of dexmedetomidine and sufentanil for PCIA after abdominal operation could reduce sufentanil consumption, decrease VAS scores, lower the rate of nausea and vomiting, and improve patient satisfaction.

Indexed as

Analgesia, Patient-ControlledAbdomenAdministration, IntravenousAnalgesicsDexmedetomidineDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPain MeasurementPatient SatisfactionPostoperative PainSingle-Blind MethodSufentanilTreatment OutcomeAnalgesicsDexmedetomidineSufentanil

Identifiers

PMID28654556
PMCPMC5898784
OpenAlexW2645856568

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.