Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28654314›Full record

ArticleJournal of diabetes science and technology2017

Cross-Validation of a Glucose-Insulin-Glucagon Pharmacodynamics Model for Simulation Using Data From Patients With Type 1 Diabetes.

Sabrina Lyngbye Wendt, Ajenthen Ranjan, Jan Kloppenborg Møller, Signe Schmidt, Carsten Boye Knudsen, Jens Juul Holst, Sten Madsbad, Henrik Madsen, Kirsten Nørgaard, John Bagterp Jørgensen

Open access · bronzeAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of diabetes science and technology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Modeling the effect of glucagon on endogenous glucose production in healthy individuals under meal-like conditions.American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology · 2025
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Estimating Increased EGP During Stress Response in Critically Ill Patients.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Mathematical modeling of the glucagon challenge test.Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics · 2019
    Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Sabrina Lyngbye Wendt1 Zealand Pharma A/S, Glostrup, Denmark.
Ajenthen Ranjan3 Department of Endocrinology, Hvidovre University Hospital, Hvidovre, Denmark.
Jan Kloppenborg Møller2 Department of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science, Technical University of Denmark, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark.
Signe Schmidt3 Department of Endocrinology, Hvidovre University Hospital, Hvidovre, Denmark.
Carsten Boye Knudsen1 Zealand Pharma A/S, Glostrup, Denmark.
Jens Juul Holst5 Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Sten Madsbad3 Department of Endocrinology, Hvidovre University Hospital, Hvidovre, Denmark.
Henrik Madsen2 Department of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science, Technical University of Denmark, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark.
Kirsten Nørgaard3 Department of Endocrinology, Hvidovre University Hospital, Hvidovre, Denmark.
John Bagterp Jørgensen2 Department of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science, Technical University of Denmark, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark.
Hvidovre Hospital · DKTechnical University of Denmark · DKZealand Pharma (Denmark) · DKDanish Diabetes Academy · DKUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCurrently, no consensus exists on a model describing endogenous glucose production (EGP) as a function of glucagon concentrations. Reliable simulations to determine the glucagon dose preventing or treating hypoglycemia or to tune a dual-hormone artificial pancreas control algorithm need a validated glucoregulatory model including the effect of glucagon.

methodsEight type 1 diabetes (T1D) patients each received a subcutaneous (SC) bolus of insulin on four study days to induce mild hypoglycemia followed by a SC bolus of saline or 100, 200, or 300 µg of glucagon. Blood samples were analyzed for concentrations of glucagon, insulin, and glucose. We fitted pharmacokinetic (PK) models to insulin and glucagon data using maximum likelihood and maximum a posteriori estimation methods. Similarly, we fitted a pharmacodynamic (PD) model to glucose data. The PD model included multiplicative effects of insulin and glucagon on EGP. Bias and precision of PD model test fits were assessed by mean predictive error (MPE) and mean absolute predictive error (MAPE).

resultsAssuming constant variables in a subject across nonoutlier visits and using thresholds of ±15% MPE and 20% MAPE, we accepted at least one and at most three PD model test fits in each of the seven subjects. Thus, we successfully validated the PD model by leave-one-out cross-validation in seven out of eight T1D patients.

conclusionsThe PD model accurately simulates glucose excursions based on plasma insulin and glucagon concentrations. The reported PK/PD model including equations and fitted parameters allows for in silico experiments that may help improve diabetes treatment involving glucagon for prevention of hypoglycemia.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationModels, BiologicalAdultBiomarkersBlood GlucoseDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1Drug Dosage CalculationsFemaleGlucagonHumansHypoglycemiaHypoglycemic AgentsInjections, SubcutaneousInsulinMaleMiddle AgedBiomarkersBlood GlucoseGlucagonHypoglycemic AgentsInsulincross-validationglucagonglucoregulatory modelparameter estimationsimulation modeltype 1 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID28654314
PMCPMC5951032
OpenAlexW2589449235

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.