Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28654047›Full record

ArticleJournal of visualized experiments : JoVE2017

Neonatal Murine Cochlear Explant Technique as an In Vitro Screening Tool in Hearing Research.

Lukas D Landegger, Sonam Dilwali, Konstantina M Stankovic

Abstract readVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Cochlear isolation in neonatal mice forFrontiers in pharmacology · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Mechanosensory neuron regeneration in adultDevelopment (Cambridge, England) · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. A NovelFrontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lukas D LandeggerEaton Peabody Laboratories, Department of Otolaryngology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear; Department of Otolaryngology, Harvard Medical School; Department of Otolaryngology, Vienna General Hospital, Medical University of Vienna.
Sonam DilwaliEaton Peabody Laboratories, Department of Otolaryngology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear; Harvard Program in Speech and Hearing Bioscience and Technology.
Konstantina M StankovicEaton Peabody Laboratories, Department of Otolaryngology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear; Department of Otolaryngology, Harvard Medical School; Harvard Program in Speech and Hearing Bioscience and Technology; konstantina_stankovic@meei.harvard.edu.

Funding

TRAINING FOR SPEECH AND HEARING SCIENCEST32DC000038 · NIDCD · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI Gwenaelle S Geleoc · 1992 to 2026
$21.8M
Mechanisms of sensorineural hearing loss: secreted factorsR01DC015824 · NIDCD · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI STANKOVIC, KONSTANTINA M · 2016 to 2020
$2.2M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC015824NIDCD NIH HHS T32 DC000038
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While there have been remarkable advances in hearing research over the past few decades, there is still no cure for Sensorineural Hearing Loss (SNHL), a condition that typically involves damage to or loss of the delicate mechanosensory structures of the inner ear. Sophisticated in vitro and ex vivo assays have emerged in recent years, enabling the screening of an increasing number of potentially therapeutic compounds while minimizing resources and accelerating efforts to develop cures for SNHL. Though homogenous cultures of certain cell types continue to play an important role in current research, many scientists now rely on more complex organotypic cultures of murine inner ears, also known as cochlear explants. The preservation of organized cellular structures within the inner ear facilitates the in situ evaluation of various components of the cochlear infrastructure, including inner and outer hair cells, spiral ganglion neurons, neurites, and supporting cells. Here we present the preparation, culture, treatment, and immunostaining of neonatal murine cochlear explants. The careful preparation of these explants facilitates the identification of mechanisms that contribute to SNHL and constitutes a valuable tool for the hearing research community.

Indexed as

AnimalsCochleaDissectionDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalHearing Loss, SensorineuralMiceModels, AnimalTissue Culture Techniques

Identifiers

PMID28654047
PMCPMC5608349

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.