Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28653594›Full record

ArticlePublic health nutrition2017

The fruit and vegetable intake of young Australian adults: a population perspective.

Monica Nour, Zhixian Sui, Amanda Grech, Anna Rangan, Kevin McGeechan, Margaret Allman-Farinelli

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public health nutrition, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Social media, body image and food choices in healthy young adults: A mixed methods systematic review.Nutrition & dietetics : the journal of the Dietitians Association of Australia · 2020
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Monica Nour1The University of Sydney,School of Life and Environmental Sciences,Level 4 EAST,Charles Perkins Centre D17,John Hopkins Drive,Sydney,NSW 2006,Australia.
Zhixian Sui1The University of Sydney,School of Life and Environmental Sciences,Level 4 EAST,Charles Perkins Centre D17,John Hopkins Drive,Sydney,NSW 2006,Australia.
Amanda Grech1The University of Sydney,School of Life and Environmental Sciences,Level 4 EAST,Charles Perkins Centre D17,John Hopkins Drive,Sydney,NSW 2006,Australia.
Anna Rangan1The University of Sydney,School of Life and Environmental Sciences,Level 4 EAST,Charles Perkins Centre D17,John Hopkins Drive,Sydney,NSW 2006,Australia.
Kevin McGeechan2The University of Sydney,School of Public Health,Sydney,NSW,Australia.
Margaret Allman-Farinelli1The University of Sydney,School of Life and Environmental Sciences,Level 4 EAST,Charles Perkins Centre D17,John Hopkins Drive,Sydney,NSW 2006,Australia.
University of Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo examine intakes and variety of fruit and vegetables consumed by Australian young adults, also assessing differences by meal occasion and sociodemographic characteristics.

designSecondary analysis of cross-sectional 24 h recall data collected through the 2011-12 National Nutrition and Physical Activity Survey. Crude means and proportions consuming fruits and vegetables were calculated. Pearson χ 2 tests, Kruskal-Wallis analyses and linear regression models were used to assess differences in mean intakes by age, BMI and sociodemographic variables. The variety eaten was determined based on the number of fruit and vegetable subgroups consumed.

settingRepresentative sample of metropolitan and rural areas across Australia. SUBJECTS: Respondents aged 18-34 years were included (n 2397).

resultsMean daily intake of fruit (128 g/0·9 servings) and vegetables (205 g/2·7 servings) was lower than the minimum recommended intake set at 2 and 5 servings, respectively. Age was positively associated with fruit and vegetable intake (P=0·002, P<0·001), with 18-24-year-olds reporting the poorest vegetable variety compared with 25-29- and 30-34-year-olds (P=0·002). When controlling for total energy, males consumed less vegetables than females (P=0·002). A large proportion of the 15 % of respondents who consumed adequate amounts of fruits and vegetables on the day prior to the survey reported intake across all meal occasions (P<0·001).

conclusionsFruit and vegetable intake is suboptimal among Australian young adults. An age-appropriate campaign is recommended to target increased consumption, particularly for those aged 18-24 years, with opportunity to promote increased variety and consumption across the day.

Indexed as

DietFruitVegetablesAdolescentAdultAnthropometryAustraliaBody Mass IndexCross-Sectional StudiesExerciseFemaleHealth SurveysHumansLife StyleMaleMental RecallFruitsPopulation studiesVegetablesYoung adults

Identifiers

PMID28653594
PMCPMC10261453
OpenAlexW2725235738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.