Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28653391›Full record

ArticleBiometrics2018

Multiple phenotype association tests using summary statistics in genome-wide association studies.

Zhonghua Liu, Xihong Lin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biometrics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Zhonghua LiuDepartment of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston 02115, U.S.A.ORCID 0000-0003-3048-9823
Xihong LinDepartment of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston 02115, U.S.A.

Funding

Translating Molecular and Clinical Data to Population Lung Cancer Risk AssessmentU19CA203654 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO HEALTH SCIS CTR · PI Christopher I. Amos, Rayjean J. Hung · 2017 to 2026
$23.7M
Statistical Methods for Analysis of Massive Genetic and Genomic Data in Cancer ResearchR35CA197449 · NCI · HARVARD UNIVERSITY D/B/A HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI XIHONG LIN · 2015 to 2026
$10.9M
Statistical Methods for the Spatio-Temporal Assessment of Social Disparities in CancerP01CA134294 · NCI · HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI HANEUSE, SEBASTIEN, HERNAN, MIGUEL · 2008 to 2017
$6.8M
Powering whole genome sequence-based genetic discovery for common human diseases- Extended 2021-2022.U01HG009088 · NHGRI · HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI LIN, XIHONG, NEALE, BENJAMIN MICHAEL · 2016 to 2021
$5.1M
Leveraging Family Data to Identify Genetic Variants for Sleep ApneaR01HL113338 · NHLBI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI LIN, XIHONG, REDLINE, SUSAN S. · 2012 to 2016
$4.4M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA134294NCI NIH HHS R35 CA197449NCI NIH HHS U19 CA203654NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG009088NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL113338
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We study in this article jointly testing the associations of a genetic variant with correlated multiple phenotypes using the summary statistics of individual phenotype analysis from Genome-Wide Association Studies (GWASs). We estimated the between-phenotype correlation matrix using the summary statistics of individual phenotype GWAS analyses, and developed genetic association tests for multiple phenotypes by accounting for between-phenotype correlation without the need to access individual-level data. Since genetic variants often affect multiple phenotypes differently across the genome and the between-phenotype correlation can be arbitrary, we proposed robust and powerful multiple phenotype testing procedures by jointly testing a common mean and a variance component in linear mixed models for summary statistics. We computed the p-values of the proposed tests analytically. This computational advantage makes our methods practically appealing in large-scale GWASs. We performed simulation studies to show that the proposed tests maintained correct type I error rates, and to compare their powers in various settings with the existing methods. We applied the proposed tests to a GWAS Global Lipids Genetics Consortium summary statistics data set and identified additional genetic variants that were missed by the original single-trait analysis.

Indexed as

Models, GeneticPhenotypeAnalysis of VarianceComputer SimulationGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansLinear ModelsLipidsLipidsCorrelated phenotypesFisher methodLinear mixed modelsPleiotropySummary statisticsVariance component test

Identifiers

PMID28653391
PMCPMC5743780

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.