Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28653261›Full record

Observational studyInternational journal of clinical pharmacy2017

Future enhanced clinical role of pharmacists in Emergency Departments in England: multi-site observational evaluation.

Elizabeth Hughes, David Terry, Chi Huynh, Konstantinos Petridis, Matthew Aiello, Louis Mazard, Hirminder Ubhi, Alex Terry, Keith Wilson, Anthony Sinclair

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in International journal of clinical pharmacy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Elizabeth HughesHealth Education England - St Chads Court, 213 Hagley Road, Edgbaston, West Midlands, Birmingham, B16 9RG, UK.
David TerryAcademic Practice Unit, Pharmacy Department, Birmingham Women's and Children's Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Steelhouse Lane, Birmingham, B4 6NH, UK. d.terry@aston.ac.uk.
Chi HuynhAcademic Practice Unit, Pharmacy Department, Birmingham Women's and Children's Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Steelhouse Lane, Birmingham, B4 6NH, UK.
Konstantinos PetridisAcademic Practice Unit, Pharmacy Department, Birmingham Women's and Children's Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Steelhouse Lane, Birmingham, B4 6NH, UK.
Matthew AielloHealth Education England - St Chads Court, 213 Hagley Road, Edgbaston, West Midlands, Birmingham, B16 9RG, UK.
Louis MazardAcademic Practice Unit, Pharmacy Department, Birmingham Women's and Children's Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Steelhouse Lane, Birmingham, B4 6NH, UK.
Hirminder UbhiPharmacy Department, Birmingham Women's and Children's Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Steelhouse Lane, Birmingham, B4 6NH, UK.
Alex TerryPharmacy Department, Birmingham Women's and Children's Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Steelhouse Lane, Birmingham, B4 6NH, UK.
Keith WilsonPharmacy Department, School of Life and Health Sciences, Aston University, Aston Triangle, Birmingham, B4 7ET, UK.
Anthony SinclairPharmacy Department, Birmingham Women's and Children's Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Steelhouse Lane, Birmingham, B4 6NH, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background There are concerns about maintaining appropriate clinical staffing levels in Emergency Departments. Pharmacists may be one possible solution. Objective To determine if Emergency Department attendees could be clinically managed by pharmacists with or without advanced clinical practice training. Setting Prospective 49 site cross-sectional observational study of patients attending Emergency Departments in England. Method Pharmacist data collectors identified patient attendance at their Emergency Department, recorded anonymized details of 400 cases and categorized each into one of four possible options: cases which could be managed by a community pharmacist; could be managed by a hospital pharmacist independent prescriber; could be managed by a hospital pharmacist independent prescriber with additional clinical training; or medical team only (unsuitable for pharmacists to manage). Impact indices sensitive to both workload and proportion of pharmacist manageable cases were calculated for each clinical group. Main outcome measure Proportion of cases which could be managed by a pharmacist. Results 18,613 cases were observed from 49 sites. 726 (3.9%) of cases were judged suitable for clinical management by community pharmacists, 719 (3.9%) by pharmacist prescribers, 5202 (27.9%) by pharmacist prescribers with further training, and 11,966 (64.3%) for medical team only. Impact Indices of the most frequent clinical groupings were general medicine (13.18) and orthopaedics (9.69). Conclusion The proportion of Emergency Department cases that could potentially be managed by a pharmacist was 36%. Greatest potential for pharmacist management was in general medicine and orthopaedics (usually minor trauma). Findings support the case for extending the clinical role of pharmacists.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelProfessional RoleCross-Sectional StudiesEmergency Service, HospitalEnglandForecastingHumansPharmacistsPharmacy Service, HospitalClinical pharmacyEmergency DepartmentPharmacistPharmacist training

Identifiers

PMID28653261
PMCPMC5541106

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.