Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28653107›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2017

A multicenter study of attitudinal barriers to cancer pain management.

Sigridur Gunnarsdottir, Valgerdur Sigurdardottir, Marianne Kloke, Lukas Radbruch, Rainer Sabatowski, Stein Kaasa, Pål Klepstad

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Pain knowledge of patients and family caregivers as predictors of pain management outcomes in cancer patients: a multicenter study in China.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Fear of analgesic side effects predicts preference for acupuncture: a cross-sectional study of cancer patients with pain in the USA.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Relationships between patient-related attitudinal barriers, analgesic adherence and pain relief in Chinese cancer inpatients.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Pain management index (PMI)-does it reflect cancer patients' wish for focus on pain?Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2020
    Observational
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sigridur GunnarsdottirLandspitali-The National University Hospital of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland. sigridgu@landspitali.is.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7579-8668
Valgerdur SigurdardottirLandspitali-The National University Hospital of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland.
Marianne KlokeKliniken Essen-Mitte Germany, Essen, Germany.
Lukas RadbruchDepartment of Palliative Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Rainer SabatowskiComprehensive Pain Center, University Hospital "Carl Gustav Carus," Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Stein KaasaEuropean Palliative Care Research Centre, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway.
Pål KlepstadEuropean Palliative Care Research Centre, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this study was to examine attitudinal barriers to cancer pain management and their relationship to pain, analgesic use, clinical, and demographic variables, as well as QOL, in a large sample of patients receiving strong opioids for pain in three European countries.

methodsParticipants in the present study were 555 patients with cancer, 18 years and older recruited from six centers in Germany, Iceland, and Norway. All had received strong opioids for at least 72 h. Data was collected with the Barriers Questionnaire-II, the Brief Pain Inventory, and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30.

resultsThe mean (SD) age of patients was 61.68 (12.35) years and 53% were men. Most common diagnoses were gastrointestinal, lung, prostate, and breast cancer. The mean (SD) time from diagnosis was 32.24 (44.55) and 4.97 (9.64) months from start of opioid therapy. Mean (SD) pain severity was 3.19 (1.93) on a 0 to 10 scale, and 46.5% reported worst pain of 7 or higher. Attitudinal barriers had a mean (SD) of 1.95 (0.82) on a 0-5 scale, with fear of addiction as the strongest barrier across countries 2.85 (1.49). Barrier scores increased with age, and were higher among men than women. Higher barrier scores were associated with higher pain severity and interference, and lower performance status, but not with global health-QOL. Patients who had been on opioids for a shorter time reported higher barriers.

conclusionsAttitudinal barriers are frequent in cancer pain patients on opioids and are associated with less effective pain control.

Indexed as

FemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsPainPain ManagementSurveys and QuestionnairesAnalgesicsBarriersCancerInternationalMulticenterPain

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.