ArticleNeuroImage. Clinical2017
Acute effects and after-effects of acoustic coordinated reset neuromodulation in patients with chronic subjective tinnitus.
Article in NeuroImage. Clinical, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07637708 (Personalized Music-embedded Sound Therapy Based on Gating Modulation and Neural Decoupling Reduces Tinnitus Severity in Adults Between 18 and 75 Years, With Chronic Tinnitus, Assessed With Tinnitus Handicap Inventory), which is not on this map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Personalized Music-embedded Sound Therapy Based on Gating Modulation and Neural Decoupling Reduces Tinnitus Severity in Adults Between 18 and 75 Years, With Chronic Tinnitus, Assessed With Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI)
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.
- Personalized Music-Embedded Sound Therapy Based on Gating Modulation and Neural Decoupling Reduces Tinnitus Severity.Brain sciences · 2026Article
- Efficacy and safety of a modified sound therapy for patients with subjective tinnitus (MOST): a multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial.EClinicalMedicine · 2025Article
- Personalized Sound Therapy Combined with Low and High-Frequency Electromagnetic Stimulation for Chronic Tinnitus.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Article
- Synaptic reorganization of synchronized neuronal networks with synaptic weight and structural plasticity.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- Effect of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Resting-State Brain Activity in Individuals with Tinnitus.Brain sciences · 2024Article
- Targeted neuroplasticity in spatiotemporally patterned invasive neuromodulation therapies for improving clinical outcomes.Frontiers in neuroinformatics · 2023Article
- Article
- Long-Lasting Desynchronization Effects of Coordinated Reset Stimulation Improved by Random Jitters.Frontiers in physiology · 2021Article
- Treatment Tone Spacing and Acute Effects of Acoustic Coordinated Reset Stimulation in Tinnitus Patients.Frontiers in network physiology · 2021Article
- Sense and Sensibility: A Review of the Behavioral Neuroscience of Tinnitus Sound Therapy and a New Typology.Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · 2021Review
- Global resting-state functional connectivity of neural oscillations in tinnitus with and without hearing loss.Human brain mapping · 2020Article
- The state of the art of sound therapy for subjective tinnitus in adults.Therapeutic advances in chronic disease · 2020Review
- Acoustic coordinated reset therapy for tinnitus with perceptually relevant frequency spacing and levels.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- The Evolution of Neuromodulation in the Treatment of Chronic Pain: Forward-Looking Perspectives.Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.) · 2019Review
- How stimulation frequency and intensity impact on the long-lasting effects of coordinated reset stimulation.PLoS computational biology · 2018Article
- Adapted Acoustic CR Neuromodulation in Patients With Chronic Tonal Tinnitus and Hearing Loss.Frontiers in medicine · 2018Article
- Computationally Developed Sham Stimulation Protocol for Multichannel Desynchronizing Stimulation.Frontiers in physiology · 2018Article
- Neurofeedback for Tinnitus Treatment - Review and Current Concepts.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2017Review
- Susceptibility to Residual Inhibition Is Associated With Hearing Loss and Tinnitus Chronicity.Trends in hearingArticle
- Comparison of Amplitude Modulated Sounds and Pure Tones at the Tinnitus Frequency: Residual Tinnitus Suppression and Stimulus Evaluation.Trends in hearingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chronic subjective tinnitus is an auditory phantom phenomenon characterized by abnormal neuronal synchrony in the central auditory system. As shown computationally, acoustic coordinated reset (CR) neuromodulation causes a long-lasting desynchronization of pathological synchrony by downregulating abnormal synaptic connectivity. In a previous proof of concept study acoustic CR neuromodulation, employing stimulation tone patterns tailored to the dominant tinnitus frequency, was compared to noisy CR-like stimulation, a CR version significantly detuned by sparing the tinnitus-related pitch range and including substantial random variability of the tone spacing on the frequency axis. Both stimulation protocols caused an acute relief as measured with visual analogue scale scores for tinnitus loudness (VAS-L) and annoyance (VAS-A) in the stimulation-ON condition (i.e. 15 min after stimulation onset), but only acoustic CR neuromodulation had sustained long-lasting therapeutic effects after 12 weeks of treatment as assessed with VAS-L, VAS-A scores and a tinnitus questionnaire (TQ) in the stimulation-OFF condition (i.e. with patients being off stimulation for at least 2.5 h). To understand the source of the long-lasting therapeutic effects, we here study whether acoustic CR neuromodulation has different electrophysiological effects on oscillatory brain activity as compared to noisy CR-like stimulation under stimulation-ON conditions and immediately after cessation of stimulation. To this end, we used a single-blind, single application, cross over design in 18 patients with chronic tonal subjective tinnitus and administered three different 16-minute stimulation protocols: acoustic CR neuromodulation, noisy CR-like stimulation and low frequency range (LFR) stimulation, a CR type stimulation with deliberately detuned pitch and repetition rate of stimulation tones, as control stimulation. We measured VAS-L and VAS-A scores together with spontaneous EEG activity pre-, during- and post-stimulation. Under stimulation-ON conditions acoustic CR neuromodulation and noisy CR-like stimulation had similar effects: a reduction of VAS-L and VAS-A scores together with a decrease of auditory delta power and an increase of auditory alpha and gamma power, without significant differences. In contrast, LFR stimulation had significantly weaker EEG effects and no significant clinical effects under stimulation-ON conditions. The distinguishing feature between acoustic CR neuromodulation and noisy CR-like stimulation were the electrophysiological after-effects. Acoustic CR neuromodulation caused the longest significant reduction of delta and gamma and increase of alpha power in the auditory cortex region. Noisy CR-like stimulation had weaker and LFR stimulation hardly any electrophysiological after-effects. This qualitative difference further supports the assertion that long-term effects of acoustic CR neuromodulation on tinnitus are mediated by a specific disruption of synchronous neural activity. Furthermore, our results indicate that acute electrophysiological after-effects might serve as a marker to further improve desynchronizing sound stimulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.