Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28652968›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage. Clinical2017

Acute effects and after-effects of acoustic coordinated reset neuromodulation in patients with chronic subjective tinnitus.

Ilya Adamchic, Timea Toth, Christian Hauptmann, Martin Walger, Berthold Langguth, Ingrid Klingmann, Peter Alexander Tass

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage. Clinical, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07637708 (Personalized Music-embedded Sound Therapy Based on Gating Modulation and Neural Decoupling Reduces Tinnitus Severity in Adults Between 18 and 75 Years, With Chronic Tinnitus, Assessed With Tinnitus Handicap Inventory), which is not on this map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07637708 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Personalized Music-embedded Sound Therapy Based on Gating Modulation and Neural Decoupling Reduces Tinnitus Severity in Adults Between 18 and 75 Years, With Chronic Tinnitus, Assessed With Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI)

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of ChileRan2024 to 2026Enrolled25ConditionsTinnitusArmsMusic intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Ilya AdamchicInstitute of Neuroscience and Medicine-Neuromodulation (INM-7), Jülich Research Center, Jülich 52428, Germany.
Timea TothInstitute of Neuroscience and Medicine-Neuromodulation (INM-7), Jülich Research Center, Jülich 52428, Germany.
Christian HauptmannInstitute of Neuroscience and Medicine-Neuromodulation (INM-7), Jülich Research Center, Jülich 52428, Germany.
Martin WalgerJean-Uhrmacher-Institute for Clinical ENT-Research, University of Cologne, Geibelstraße 29-31, Cologne 50931, Germany; Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Audiology and Pediatric Audiology, University of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, Cologne 50937, Germany. Electronic address: martin.walger@uni-koeln.de.
Berthold LangguthDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Regensburg, Bezirksklinikum, Universitätsstraße 84, Regensburg 93053, Germany; Interdisciplinary Tinnitus Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany. Electronic address: Berthold.Langguth@medbo.de.
Ingrid KlingmannPharmaplex bvba, Avenue Saint-Hubert 51, Wezembeek-Oppem 1970, Belgium. Electronic address: iklingmann@pharmaplex.be.
Peter Alexander TassInstitute of Neuroscience and Medicine-Neuromodulation (INM-7), Jülich Research Center, Jülich 52428, Germany; Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University, 300 Pasteur Drive, Stanford, CA 94305-5327, USA; Department of Neuromodulation, University of Cologne, Gleueler Straße 176-178, Cologne 50935, Germany. Electronic address: ptass@stanford.edu.
Forschungszentrum Jülich · DECentexbel · BEUniversity Hospital Regensburg · DEUniversity of Cologne · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic subjective tinnitus is an auditory phantom phenomenon characterized by abnormal neuronal synchrony in the central auditory system. As shown computationally, acoustic coordinated reset (CR) neuromodulation causes a long-lasting desynchronization of pathological synchrony by downregulating abnormal synaptic connectivity. In a previous proof of concept study acoustic CR neuromodulation, employing stimulation tone patterns tailored to the dominant tinnitus frequency, was compared to noisy CR-like stimulation, a CR version significantly detuned by sparing the tinnitus-related pitch range and including substantial random variability of the tone spacing on the frequency axis. Both stimulation protocols caused an acute relief as measured with visual analogue scale scores for tinnitus loudness (VAS-L) and annoyance (VAS-A) in the stimulation-ON condition (i.e. 15 min after stimulation onset), but only acoustic CR neuromodulation had sustained long-lasting therapeutic effects after 12 weeks of treatment as assessed with VAS-L, VAS-A scores and a tinnitus questionnaire (TQ) in the stimulation-OFF condition (i.e. with patients being off stimulation for at least 2.5 h). To understand the source of the long-lasting therapeutic effects, we here study whether acoustic CR neuromodulation has different electrophysiological effects on oscillatory brain activity as compared to noisy CR-like stimulation under stimulation-ON conditions and immediately after cessation of stimulation. To this end, we used a single-blind, single application, cross over design in 18 patients with chronic tonal subjective tinnitus and administered three different 16-minute stimulation protocols: acoustic CR neuromodulation, noisy CR-like stimulation and low frequency range (LFR) stimulation, a CR type stimulation with deliberately detuned pitch and repetition rate of stimulation tones, as control stimulation. We measured VAS-L and VAS-A scores together with spontaneous EEG activity pre-, during- and post-stimulation. Under stimulation-ON conditions acoustic CR neuromodulation and noisy CR-like stimulation had similar effects: a reduction of VAS-L and VAS-A scores together with a decrease of auditory delta power and an increase of auditory alpha and gamma power, without significant differences. In contrast, LFR stimulation had significantly weaker EEG effects and no significant clinical effects under stimulation-ON conditions. The distinguishing feature between acoustic CR neuromodulation and noisy CR-like stimulation were the electrophysiological after-effects. Acoustic CR neuromodulation caused the longest significant reduction of delta and gamma and increase of alpha power in the auditory cortex region. Noisy CR-like stimulation had weaker and LFR stimulation hardly any electrophysiological after-effects. This qualitative difference further supports the assertion that long-term effects of acoustic CR neuromodulation on tinnitus are mediated by a specific disruption of synchronous neural activity. Furthermore, our results indicate that acute electrophysiological after-effects might serve as a marker to further improve desynchronizing sound stimulation.

Indexed as

Acoustic StimulationAdultAuditory CortexBrain WavesChronic DiseaseCross-Over StudiesElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSingle-Blind MethodTinnitusAlpha band activityCoordinated reset neuromodulationDelta band activityElectroencephalographyGamma band activity

Identifiers

PMID28652968
PMCPMC5476468
OpenAlexW2617110132

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.