Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28652918›Full record

ReviewBiomarker research2017

Engineering CAR-T cells.

Cheng Zhang, Jun Liu, Jiang F Zhong, Xi Zhang

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomarker research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 304 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
304citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
17.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

304 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 546 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The Role of [Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

244 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Cheng ZhangDepartment of Hematology, Xinqiao Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, 400037 People's Republic of China.
Jun LiuDepartment of Hematology, Xinqiao Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, 400037 People's Republic of China.
Jiang F ZhongDivision of Periodontology, Diagnostic Sciences & Dental Hygiene, and Division of Biomedical Sciences, Herman Ostrow School of Dentistry, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA USA.
Xi ZhangDepartment of Hematology, Xinqiao Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, 400037 People's Republic of China.
Xinqiao Hospital · CNArmy Medical University · CNUniversity of Southern California · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chimeric antigen receptor redirected T cells (CAR-T cells) have achieved inspiring outcomes in patients with B cell malignancies, and are now being investigated in other hematologic malignancies and solid tumors. CAR-T cells are generated by the T cells from patients' or donors' blood. After the T cells are expanded and genetically modified, they are reinfused into the patients. However, many challenges still need to be resolved in order for this technology to gain widespread adoption. In this review, we first discuss the structure and evolution of chimeric antigen receptors. We then report on the tools used for production of CAR-T cells. Finally, we address the challenges posed by CAR-T cells.

Indexed as

CAR-T cellsChimeric antigen receptor redirected T cellsEvolutionProductionStructureViral vector

Identifiers

PMID28652918
PMCPMC5482931
OpenAlexW2688905162

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.