ArticleJournal of materials chemistry. B2017
Tunable delayed controlled release profile from layered polymeric microparticles.
Article in Journal of materials chemistry. B, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Core-Shell Particles: From Fabrication Methods to Diverse Manipulation Techniques.Micromachines · 2023Review
- Biodegradable Microparticles for Regenerative Medicine: A State of the Art and Trends to Clinical Application.Polymers · 2022Review
- Nanoengineered Light-Activatable Polybubbles for On-Demand Therapeutic Delivery.Advanced functional materials · 2020Article
- Spatiotemporal presentation of exogenous SDF-1 with PLGA nanoparticles modulates SDF-1/CXCR4 signaling axis in the rodent cortex.Biomaterials science · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Composite microparticles (MPs) with layered architecture, engineered from poly(L-lactic acid) (PLLA) and poly(D,L-lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA), are promising devices for achieving the delayed release of proteins. Here, we build on a water-in-oil-in-oil-in-water emulsion method of fabricating layered MPs with an emphasis on modulating the delay period of the protein release profile. Particle hardening parameters (i.e. polymer precipitation rate and total hardening time) following water-in-oil-in-oil-in-water emulsions are known to affect MP structure such as the core/shell material and cargo localization. We demonstrate that layered MPs fabricated with two different solvent evaporation parameters not only alter polymer and protein distribution within the hardened MPs, but also affect their protein release profiles. Secondly, we hypothesize that ethanol (EtOH), a semi-polar solvent miscible in both the solvent (dichloromethane; DCM) and non-solvent aqueous phases, likely alters DCM and water flux from the dispersed oil phase. The results reveal that EtOH affects protein distribution within MPs, and may also influence MP structural properties such as porosity and polymer distribution. To our knowledge, we are the first to demonstrate EtOH as a means for modulating critical release parameters from protein-loaded, layered PLGA/PLLA MPs. Throughout all the groups in the study, we achieved differential delay periods (between 0 - 30 days after an initial burst release) and total protein release periods (~30 - >58 days) as a function of solvent evaporation parameters and EtOH content. The layered MPs proposed in the study potentially have wide-reaching applications in tissue engineering for delayed and sequential protein release.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.