Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28652771›Full record

ReviewOncoTargets and therapy2017

The prognostic value of cyclooxygenase-2 expression in patients with esophageal cancer: evidence from a meta-analysis.

Zaoxiu Hu, Yanlong Yang, Yonghe Zhao, Yunchao Huang

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in OncoTargets and therapy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Targeting inflammation as cancer therapy.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Role of Prostaglandin E2 in the Progression of Gastrointestinal Cancer.Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Role of prostanoids in gastrointestinal cancer.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Zaoxiu HuDepartment of Pathology.
Yanlong YangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery I, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University (Yunnan Cancer Hospital).
Yonghe ZhaoDepartment of Pathology, The Forensic School of Kunming Medical University.
Yunchao HuangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery I, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University (Yunnan Cancer Hospital).
Kunming Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Published studies have investigated the prognostic role of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) expression in patients with esophageal cancer (EC), but the result remains controversial. Thus, this meta-analysis was conducted to comprehensively evaluate the impact of COX-2 expression on the prognostic value in patients with EC. Relevant studies were identified from PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases. Studies that detected the COX-2 expression by immunohistochemistry and evaluated the relationship between COX-2 expression and overall survival (OS) or clinicopathological parameters were used in our analysis. The summary hazard ratios (HRs) or odds ratios were calculated to assess the risk or hazard association. A total of 25 studies, which included 2,465 patients, were included in our meta-analysis. Our analysis suggested that overexpression of COX-2 was associated with poor OS (HR =1.60, 95% CI =1.32-1.94,

Indexed as

cyclooxygenase-2esophageal cancermeta-analysisprognosis

Identifiers

PMID28652771
PMCPMC5476766
OpenAlexW2621625827

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.