Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28652716›Full record

Trial reportClinical interventions in aging2017

Can we improve pain and sleep in elderly individuals with transcranial direct current stimulation? - Results from a randomized controlled pilot study.

Marie-Philippe Harvey, Dominique Lorrain, Marylie Martel, Kayla Bergeron-Vezina, Francis Houde, Mario Séguin, Guillaume Léonard

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical interventions in aging, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Brain stimulation targets for chronic pain: Insights from meta-analysis, functional connectivity and literature review.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Non-invasive brain stimulation techniques for chronic pain.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  7. Non-invasive brain stimulation techniques for chronic pain.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Effectiveness of transcranial direct current stimulation in chronic pain and neurogenic claudication related to lumbar spinal stenosis.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2024
    Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Neuropathic Pain in the Elderly.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Marie-Philippe HarveyResearch Centre on Aging, CIUSSS de l'Estrie-CHUS.
Dominique LorrainResearch Centre on Aging, CIUSSS de l'Estrie-CHUS.
Marylie MartelResearch Centre on Aging, CIUSSS de l'Estrie-CHUS.
Kayla Bergeron-VezinaResearch Centre on Aging, CIUSSS de l'Estrie-CHUS.
Francis HoudeResearch Centre on Aging, CIUSSS de l'Estrie-CHUS.
Mario SéguinFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke.
Guillaume LéonardResearch Centre on Aging, CIUSSS de l'Estrie-CHUS.
Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux du Saguenay–Lac-Saint-Jean · CAUniversité de Sherbrooke · CACentre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux du Centre-Sud-de-l'Île-de-Montréal · CADirection Générale Déléguée aux Ressources · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe prevalence of chronic pain and sleep disturbances substantially increases with age. Pharmacotherapy remains the primary treatment option for these health issues. However, side effects and drug interactions are difficult to control in elderly individuals.

aimsThe objective of this study was to assess the feasibility of conducting a randomized sham-controlled trial and to collect preliminary data on the efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to reduce pain and improve sleep in older adults suffering from chronic pain.

methodsFourteen elderly individuals (mean age 71±7 years) suffering from chronic pain and sleep complaints were randomized to receive either anodal tDCS, applied over the primary motor cortex (2 mA, 20 minutes), or sham tDCS, for 5 consecutive days. Pain was measured with visual analog scales, pain logbooks and questionnaires, while sleep was assessed with actigraphy, sleep diaries and questionnaires.

resultsThere were no missing data for pain and sleep measures, except for actigraphy, that generated several missing data. Blinding was maintained throughout the study, for both the evaluator and participants. Active but not sham tDCS significantly reduced pain (

conclusionThe present study provides guidelines for the implementation of future tDCS studies in larger populations of elderly individuals. M1 anodal tDCS in this population appears to be effective to reduce pain, but not to improve sleep.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overChronic PainDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMotor CortexPain MeasurementPilot ProjectsSleep Wake DisordersTranscranial Direct Current StimulationVisual Analog ScaleactigraphyagingelderlypainsleeptDCStranscranial direct current stimulation

Identifiers

PMID28652716
PMCPMC5472413
OpenAlexW2621752280

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.