Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28652562›Full record

ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2017

Correlation Factors Analysis of Breast Cancer Tumor Volume Doubling Time Measured by 3D-Ultrasound.

Shuyin Zhang, Yan Ding, Qiaoying Zhou, Cheng Wang, Pengxi Wu, Ji Dong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Estimating Distributions of Breast Cancer Onset and Growth in a Swedish Mammography Screening Cohort.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Shuyin ZhangDepartment of Ultrasound, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China (mainland).
Yan DingDepartment of Medical Ultrasound, Nanjing Medical University Affiliated Wuxi People's Hospital, Wuxi, Jiangsu, China (mainland).
Qiaoying ZhouDepartment of Medical Ultrasound, Nanjing Medical University Affiliated Wuxi People's Hospital, Wuxi, Jiangsu, China (mainland).
Cheng WangDepartment of Ultrasound, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China (mainland).
Pengxi WuDepartment of Medical Ultrasound, Nanjing Medical University Affiliated Wuxi People's Hospital, Wuxi, Jiangsu, China (mainland).
Ji DongDepartment of Medical Ultrasound, Nanjing Medical University Affiliated Wuxi People's Hospital, Wuxi, Jiangsu, China (mainland).

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND Tumor volume doubling time (TVDT) is relatively important for breast cancer diagnosis and prognosis evaluation. This study aimed to analyze the related factors that may affect the TVDT of breast cancer by three-dimensional ultrasound (3D-US). MATERIAL AND METHODS A total of 69 breast cancer patients were selected. 3D-US was applied to measure the volume of breast lumps diagnosed as BI-RADS-US 4A by conventional ultrasound. TVDT was calculated according to the formula TVDT=DT×log2/log(V2/V1). Multiple linear regression analysis was performed to analyze the factors influencing breast cancer TVDT. RESULTS The mean and median TVDT were 185±126 (range 66-521) and 164 days, respectively. TVDT showed no statistical significance according to regular shape, coarse margin, spicule sign, peripheral hyperechoic halo, microcalcification, and different posterior echo characteristics (P>0.05). Patients grouped by age, axillary lymphatic metastasis, histological differentiation, and Nottingham prognostic index (NPI) score exhibited significantly different TVDT (P<0.05). On the contrary, patients with different menstrual conditions, breast cancer family history, or pathological types presented similar TVDT (P>0.05). TVDT was obviously different in breast cancer with different ER, PR, Ki-67, and molecular subtyping but not HER2 expression. Multivariate analysis revealed that NPI score, axillary lymphatic metastasis, Ki-67, and molecular subtyping were risk factors of TVDT in breast cancer (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS Breast cancer TVDT was significantly correlated with NPI score, axillary lymphatic metastasis, Ki-67, and molecular subtyping. Triple-negative breast cancer exhibited the most rapid growth.

Indexed as

Imaging, Three-DimensionalTumor BurdenUltrasonographyAdultAgedBreast NeoplasmsFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleHumansLinear ModelsMiddle AgedTriple Negative Breast Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID28652562
PMCPMC5498121

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.