Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28652524›Full record

ArticleMagnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine2018

Single-Breath-Hold Whole-heart Unenhanced Coronary MRA Using Multi-shot Gradient Echo EPI at 3T: Comparison with Free-breathing Turbo-field-echo Coronary MRA on Healthy Volunteers.

Yuji Iyama, Takeshi Nakaura, Yasunori Nagayama, Seitaro Oda, Daisuke Utsunomiya, Masafumi Kidoh, Hideaki Yuki, Kenichiro Hirata, Tomohiro Namimoto, Mika Kitajima and 5 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 91% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Yuji IyamaDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University.
Takeshi NakauraDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University.
Yasunori NagayamaDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University.
Seitaro OdaDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University.
Daisuke UtsunomiyaDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University.
Masafumi KidohDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University.
Hideaki YukiDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University.
Kenichiro HirataDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University.
Tomohiro NamimotoDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University.
Mika KitajimaDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University.
Kosuke MoritaDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University.
Yoshinori FunamaDepartment of Medical Physics, Faculty of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University.
Atsushi TakemuraPhilips Healthcare AsiaPacific.
Tomoyuki OkuakiPhilips Healthcare AsiaPacific.
Yasuyuki YamashitaDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University.
Kumamoto University · JPPhilips (Finland) · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe investigated the feasibility of single breath hold unenhanced coronary MRA using multi-shot gradient echo planar imaging (MSG-EPI) on a 3T-scanner.

methodsFourteen volunteers underwent single breath hold coronary MRA with a MSG-EPI and free-breathing turbo field echo (TFE) coronary MRA at 3T. The acquisition time, signal to noise ratio (SNR), and the contrast of the sequences were compared with the paired t-test. Readers evaluated the image contrast, noise, sharpness, artifacts, and the overall image quality.

resultsThe acquisition time was 88.1% shorter for MSG-EPI than TFE (24.7 ± 2.5 vs 206.4 ± 23.1 sec, P < 0.01). The SNR was significantly higher on MSG-EPI than TFE scans (P < 0.01). There was no significant difference in the contrast on MSG-EPI and TFE scans (1.8 ± 0.3 vs 1.9 ± 0.3, P = 0.24). There was no significant difference in image contrast, image sharpness, and overall image quality between two scan techniques. The score of image noise and artifact were significantly higher on MSG-EPI than TFE scans (P < 0.05).

conclusionThe single breath hold MSG-EPI sequence is a promising technique for shortening the scan time and for preserving the image quality of unenhanced whole heart coronary MRA on a 3T scanner.

Indexed as

ArtifactsBreath HoldingEcho-Planar ImagingHeartHumansMagnetic Resonance Angiographycoronary angiographymagnetic resonance imagingmenrespiration

Identifiers

PMID28652524
PMCPMC5891342
OpenAlexW2713008832

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.