Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28652439›Full record

ArticleIn vivo (Athens, Greece)

Which Is the Safer Anastomotic Method for Colon Surgery? - Ten-year Results.

Makoto Kosuge, Ken Eto, Ryosuke Hashizume, Mitsumasa Takeda, Kenta Tomori, Kai Neki, Norio Mitsumori, Katsuhiko Yanaga

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in In vivo (Athens, Greece). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Makoto KosugeDepartment of Surgery, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan kosuge@jikei.ac.jp.
Ken EtoDepartment of Surgery, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Ryosuke HashizumeDepartment of Surgery, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Mitsumasa TakedaDepartment of Surgery, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Kenta TomoriDepartment of Surgery, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Kai NekiDepartment of Surgery, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Norio MitsumoriDepartment of Surgery, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Katsuhiko YanagaDepartment of Surgery, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Jikei University School of Medicine · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

aimIn colon surgery, the anastomotic method is generally selected by surgeon's preferences or by local conditions. In this study, we retrospectively analyzed anastomotic complications to assess safe methods of anastomosis in colonic resection. PATIENTS AND

methodsWe retrospectively analyzed a total of 684 cases, performed between July 2003 and June 2013 in our Hospital. Anastomosis complications, such as leakage, stricture and bleeding, were analyzed in relation to the three methods of anastomosis, hand-sewn (HS), functional end-to-end (FEEA) and triangulating anastomosis (TRI).

resultsUnivariate analysis indicated that the incidence of leakage was significantly lower in laparoscopic surgeries (p=0.034) and TRI (p=0.047). The results of the multivariable analysis indicated that anastomotic leakage was significantly less with TRI (p=0.029).

conclusionIn colon surgery, TRI seems to be associated with a low risk of anastomotic leakage compared to HS and FEEA.

Indexed as

AgedAnastomosis, SurgicalColectomyColonFemaleHumansLaparoscopyMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsSurgical Staplingcolonic resectionfunctional end-to-end anastomosisTriangulating anastomosis

Identifiers

PMID28652439
PMCPMC5566922
OpenAlexW2717015207

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.