ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2017
Microfluidic guillotine for single-cell wound repair studies.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.
- A role for theMolecular biology of the cell · 2026Article
- A role for thebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Characterization of cellular wound resistance in the giant ciliatebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Physical Forces in Regeneration of Cells and Tissues.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2025Review
- Microfluidic systems and ultrasonics for emulsion-based biopolymers: A comprehensive review of techniques, challenges, and future directions.Ultrasonics sonochemistry · 2025Review
- Determining protein polarization proteome-wide using physical dissection of individual Stentor coeruleus cells.Current biology : CB · 2022Article
- Switching of behavioral modes and their modulation by a geometrical cue in the ciliateFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022Article
- Fabrication of 3D Micro-Blades for the Cutting of Biological Structures in a Microfluidic Guillotine.Micromachines · 2021Article
- Review
- Microfluidic guillotine reveals multiple timescales and mechanical modes of wound response in Stentor coeruleus.BMC biology · 2021Article
- Microphysiological systems for the modeling of wound healing and evaluation of pro-healing therapies.Journal of materials chemistry. B · 2020Review
- Single-cell identification by microfluidic-basedChemical science · 2019Article
- Chemical operations on a living single cell by open microfluidics for wound repair studies and organelle transport analysis.Chemical science · 2019Article
- Colour compound lenses for a portable fluorescence microscope.Light, science & applications · 2019Article
- Programming self-organizing multicellular structures with synthetic cell-cell signaling.Science (New York, N.Y.) · 2018Article
- Demarcating the membrane damage for the extraction of functional mitochondria.Microsystems & nanoengineering · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Wound repair is a key feature distinguishing living from nonliving matter. Single cells are increasingly recognized to be capable of healing wounds. The lack of reproducible, high-throughput wounding methods has hindered single-cell wound repair studies. This work describes a microfluidic guillotine for bisecting single
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.