Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28652290›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open2017

Imaging pain relief in osteoarthritis (IPRO): protocol of a double-blind randomised controlled mechanistic study assessing pain relief and prediction of duloxetine treatment outcome.

Diane Reckziegel, Helen Bailey, William J Cottam, Christopher R Tench, Ravi P Mahajan, David A Walsh, Roger D Knaggs, Dorothee P Auer

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02208778 (Functional Brain Imaging to Understand the Mechanisms of Pain Relief in Knee Osteoarthritis), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 92% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02208778 phase4completednot on this map

Functional Brain Imaging to Understand the Mechanisms of Pain Relief in Knee Osteoarthritis

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of NottinghamRan2014 to 2016Enrolled77ConditionsOsteoarthritis, Chronic PainArmsDuloxetine, Remifentanil, Placebo (for Remifentanil), Placebo (for Duloxetine)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Diane ReckziegelArthritis Research UK Pain Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Helen BaileyArthritis Research UK Pain Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
William J CottamArthritis Research UK Pain Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Christopher R TenchDivision of Clinical Neuroscience, Clinical Neurology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Ravi P MahajanArthritis Research UK Pain Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
David A WalshArthritis Research UK Pain Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Roger D KnaggsArthritis Research UK Pain Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Dorothee P AuerArthritis Research UK Pain Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Versus Arthritis · GBUniversity of Nottingham · GB

Funding

Arthritis Research UK 18769
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionOsteoarthritis (OA) pain is a major cause of long-term disability and chronic pain in the adult population. One in five patients does not receive satisfactory pain relief, which reflects the complexity of chronic pain and the current lack of understanding of mechanisms of chronic pain. Recently, duloxetine has demonstrated clinically relevant pain relief, but only in half of treated patients with OA. Here, the aim is to investigate the neural mechanisms of pain relief and neural signatures that may predict treatment response to duloxetine in chronic knee OA pain. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is an ongoing single-centre randomised placebo-controlled mechanistic study (2:1 (placebo) allocation), using a multimodal neuroimaging approach, together with psychophysiological (quantitative sensory testing), genetics and questionnaire assessments. Eighty-one subjects with chronic knee OA pain are planned to power for between-group comparisons (placebo, duloxetine responder and duloxetine non-responder). Participants have a baseline assessment and, following 6 weeks of duloxetine (30 mg for 2 weeks, then 60 mg for 4 weeks), a follow-up evaluation. Brain imaging is performed at 3T with blood-oxygen-level dependent functional MRI at rest and during pin-prick nociceptive stimulation for main outcome assessment; arterial spin labelling and structural imaging (T1-weighted) for secondary outcome assessment. Questionnaires evaluate pain, negative affect, quality of sleep and cognition. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has been approved by the East Midlands, Nottingham and is being carried out under the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki (64th, 2013) and Good Clinical Practice standards. Results will be disseminated in peer-reviewed journals and at scientific conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02208778).This work was supported by Arthritis Research UK (Grant 18769).

Indexed as

AdultAgedBrainChronic PainCross-Over StudiesDouble-Blind MethodDuloxetine HydrochlorideFemaleFunctional NeuroimagingHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedOsteoarthritis, KneePain ManagementPain MeasurementDuloxetine HydrochlorideanalgesiaantidepressantduloxetinefMRImagnetic resonance imagingOsteoarthritis pain

Identifiers

PMID28652290
PMCPMC5541453
OpenAlexW2618922975

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.