Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28651587›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2017

ACSC Indicator: testing reliability for hypertension.

Robin L Walker, William A Ghali, Guanmin Chen, Tej K Khalsa, Birinder K Mangat, Norm R C Campbell, Elijah Dixon, Doreen Rabi, Nathalie Jette, Robyn Dhanoa and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Coding mechanisms for main condition in ICD-11.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Robin L WalkerDepartment of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, 3280 Hospital Dr. NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 4Z6, Canada.
William A GhaliDepartment of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, 3280 Hospital Dr. NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 4Z6, Canada.
Guanmin ChenDepartment of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, 3280 Hospital Dr. NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 4Z6, Canada.
Tej K KhalsaDepartment of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
Birinder K MangatDepartment of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
Norm R C CampbellDepartment of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, 3280 Hospital Dr. NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 4Z6, Canada.
Elijah DixonDepartment of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, 3280 Hospital Dr. NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 4Z6, Canada.
Doreen RabiDepartment of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, 3280 Hospital Dr. NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 4Z6, Canada.
Nathalie JetteDepartment of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, 3280 Hospital Dr. NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 4Z6, Canada.
Robyn DhanoaFaculty of Nursing, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
Hude QuanDepartment of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, 3280 Hospital Dr. NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 4Z6, Canada. hquan@ucalgary.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7848-7256
University of Calgary · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWith high-quality community-based primary care, hospitalizations for ambulatory care sensitive conditions (ACSC) are considered avoidable. The purpose of this study was to test the inter-physician reliability of judgments of avoidable hospitalizations for one ACSC, uncomplicated hypertension, derived from medical chart review.

methodsWe applied the Canadian Institute for Health Information's case definition to obtain a random sample of patients who had an ACSC hospitalization for uncomplicated hypertension in Calgary, Alberta. Medical chart review was conducted by three experienced internal medicine specialists. Implicit methods were used to judge avoidability of hospitalization using a validated 5-point scale.

resultsThere was poor agreement among three physicians raters when judging the avoidability of 82 ACSC hospitalizations for uncomplicated hypertension (κ = 0.092). The κ also remained low when assessing agreement between raters 1 and 3 (κ = 0.092), but the κ was lower (less than chance agreement) for raters 1 and 2 (κ = -0.119) and raters 2 and 3 (κ = -0.008). When the 5-point scale was dichotomized, there was fair agreement among three raters (κ = 0.217). The proportion of ACSC hospitalizations for uncomplicated hypertension that were rated as avoidable was 32.9%, 6.1% and 26.8% for raters 1, 2, and 3, respectively.

conclusionsThis study found a low proportion of ACSC hospitalization were rated as avoidable, with poor to fair agreement of judgment between physician raters. This suggests that the validity and utility of this health indicator is questionable. It points to a need to abandon the use of ACSC entirely; or alternatively to work on the development of explicit criteria for judging avoidability of hospitalization for ACSC such as hypertension.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAlbertaAmbulatory CareFemaleHospitalizationHumansHypertensionMaleMiddle AgedPhysiciansPrimary Health CareQuality Indicators, Health CareReproducibility of ResultsYoung AdultAmbulatory care sensitive conditionsAvoidable hospitalizationsPrimary careQuality indicatorReliability

Identifiers

PMID28651587
PMCPMC5485699
OpenAlexW2690981266

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.