Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28651586›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2017

Development of a computer-tailored physical activity intervention for prostate and colorectal cancer patients and survivors: OncoActive.

R H J Golsteijn, C Bolman, E Volders, D A Peels, H de Vries, L Lechner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Supporting colorectal cancer survivors using eHealth: a systematic review and framework suggestion.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

R H J GolsteijnDepartment of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Open University of the Netherlands, Heerlen, PO, Box 2960, 6401 DL Heerlen, The Netherlands. rianne.golsteijn@ou.nl.
C BolmanDepartment of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Open University of the Netherlands, Heerlen, PO, Box 2960, 6401 DL Heerlen, The Netherlands.
E VoldersDepartment of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Open University of the Netherlands, Heerlen, PO, Box 2960, 6401 DL Heerlen, The Netherlands.
D A PeelsDepartment of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Open University of the Netherlands, Heerlen, PO, Box 2960, 6401 DL Heerlen, The Netherlands.
H de VriesDepartment of Health Promotion, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
L LechnerDepartment of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Open University of the Netherlands, Heerlen, PO, Box 2960, 6401 DL Heerlen, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCancer and cancer treatment coincide with substantial negative physical, psychological and psychosocial problems. Physical activity (PA) can positively affect the negative effects of cancer and cancer treatment and thereby increase quality of life in CPS. Nevertheless, only a minority of CPS meet PA guidelines. We developed the OncoActive (OncoActief in Dutch) intervention: a computer-tailored PA program to stimulate PA in prostate and colorectal CPS, because to our knowledge there are only a few PA interventions for these specific cancer types in the Netherlands

methodsThe OncoActive intervention was developed through systematic adaptation of a proven effective, evidence-based, computer-tailored PA intervention for adults over fifty, called Active Plus. The Intervention Mapping (IM) protocol was used to guide the systematic adaptation. A literature study and interviews with prostate and colorectal CPS and health care professionals revealed that both general and cancer-specific PA determinants are important and should be addressed. Change objectives, theoretical methods and applications and the actual program content were adapted to address the specific needs, beliefs and cancer-related issues of prostate and colorectal CPS. Intervention participants received tailored PA advice three times, on internet and with printed materials, and a pedometer to set goals to improve PA. Pre- and pilot tests showed that the intervention was highly appreciated (target group) and regarded safe and feasible (healthcare professionals). The effectiveness of the intervention is being evaluated in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) (n = 428), consisting of an intervention group and a usual care waiting-list control group, with follow-up measurements at three, six and twelve months. Participants are recruited from seventeen hospitals and with posters, flyers and calls in several media. DISCUSSION: Using the Intervention Mapping protocol resulted in a systematically adapted, theory and evidence-based intervention providing tailored PA advice to prostate and colorectal CPS. If the intervention turns out to be effective in increasing PA, as evaluated in a RCT, possibilities for nationwide implementation and extension to other cancer types will be explored.

trial registrationThe study is registered in the Dutch Trial Register (NTR4296) on November 23rd 2013 and can be accessed at http://www.trialregister.nl/trialreg/admin/rctview.asp?TC=4296 .

Indexed as

Quality of LifeAgedCancer SurvivorsColorectal NeoplasmsComputersEarly Intervention, EducationalExerciseFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansInternetMaleNeeds AssessmentNetherlandsPrognosisProstatic NeoplasmsCancer survivorshipColorectal cancerComputer tailoringeHealthIntervention mappingPhysical activityProstate cancer

Identifiers

PMID28651586
PMCPMC5485671

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.