ArticleGenetics, selection, evolution : GSE2017
Genomic selection for crossbred performance accounting for breed-specific effects.
Article in Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Genome-Wide Association Study Meta-Analysis Elucidates Genetic Structure and Identifies Candidate Genes of Teat Number Traits in Pigs.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Pooled it
- Integrative multi-omics analysis identifies GNAZ and SLC5A4 as critical regulators of gestation length in Large White pigs.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2026Article
- Genome-Wide Association Study Revealed Key Genes with the Teat Number in Jishen Black Pigs.Veterinary sciences · 2026Article
- Genome-Wide Association Study Pinpoints Novel Candidate Genes Associated with the Gestation Length of the First Parity in French Large White Sows.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Genomic prediction in pigs using data from a commercial crossbred population: insights from the Duroc x (Landrace x Yorkshire) three-way crossbreeding system.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2023Article
- Genomic evaluation for two-way crossbred performance in cattle.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2023Article
- Realized genomic selection across generations in a reciprocal recurrent selection breeding program ofFrontiers in plant science · 2023Article
- Genetic aspects of piglet survival and related traits: a review.Journal of animal science · 2022Review
- Genomic evaluation with multibreed and crossbred data.JDS communications · 2022Review
- Improving the accuracy of genomic predictions in an outcrossing species with hybrid cultivars between heterozygote parents: a case study of oil palm (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.).Molecular genetics and genomics : MGG · 2022Article
- Breed of origin of alleles and genomic predictions for crossbred dairy cows.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2021Article
- Purebred-crossbred genetic parameters for reproductive traits in swine.Journal of animal science · 2021Article
- Review: optimizing genomic selection for crossbred performance by model improvement and data collection.Journal of animal science · 2021Review
- Editorial: Advances in Genomics of Crossbred Farm Animals.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Article
- Next-generation biological control: the need for integrating genetics and genomics.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2020Review
- Purebred and Crossbred Genomic Evaluation and Mate Allocation Strategies To Exploit Dominance in Pig Crossbreeding Schemes.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2020Article
- Genomic Breed Composition of Selection Signatures in Brangus Beef Cattle.Frontiers in genetics · 2020Article
- A Review of Genomic Models for the Analysis of Livestock Crossbred Data.Frontiers in genetics · 2020Review
- Genome-wide association study for carcass quality traits and growth in purebred and crossbred pigs1.Journal of animal science · 2020Article
- Validation of genomic predictions for body weight in broilers using crossbred information and considering breed-of-origin of alleles.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBreed-specific effects are observed when the same allele of a given genetic marker has a different effect depending on its breed origin, which results in different allele substitution effects across breeds. In such a case, single-breed breeding values may not be the most accurate predictors of crossbred performance. Our aim was to estimate the contribution of alleles from each parental breed to the genetic variance of traits that are measured in crossbred offspring, and to compare the prediction accuracies of estimated direct genomic values (DGV) from a traditional genomic selection model (GS) that are trained on purebred or crossbred data, with accuracies of DGV from a model that accounts for breed-specific effects (BS), trained on purebred or crossbred data. The final dataset was composed of 924 Large White, 924 Landrace and 924 two-way cross (F1) genotyped and phenotyped animals. The traits evaluated were litter size (LS) and gestation length (GL) in pigs.
resultsThe genetic correlation between purebred and crossbred performance was higher than 0.88 for both LS and GL. For both traits, the additive genetic variance was larger for alleles inherited from the Large White breed compared to alleles inherited from the Landrace breed (0.74 and 0.56 for LS, and 0.42 and 0.40 for GL, respectively). The highest prediction accuracies of crossbred performance were obtained when training was done on crossbred data. For LS, prediction accuracies were the same for GS and BS DGV (0.23), while for GL, prediction accuracy for BS DGV was similar to the accuracy of GS DGV (0.53 and 0.52, respectively).
conclusionsIn this study, training on crossbred data resulted in higher prediction accuracy than training on purebred data and evidence of breed-specific effects for LS and GL was demonstrated. However, when training was done on crossbred data, both GS and BS models resulted in similar prediction accuracies. In future studies, traits with a lower genetic correlation between purebred and crossbred performance should be included to further assess the value of the BS model in genomic predictions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.