Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28651524›Full record

ArticleBMC microbiology2017

Insights into the Geobacillus stearothermophilus species based on phylogenomic principles.

S A Burgess, S H Flint, D Lindsay, M P Cox, P J Biggs

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC microbiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Bacteriophages of Thermophilic 'International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Endo-β-1,4-Xylanase GH10 fromInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Complete genome sequence ofMicrobiology resource announcements · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  9. Germination and Heat Resistance ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Complete genome sequences ofMicrobiology resource announcements · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Genomic attributes of thermophilic and hyperthermophilic bacteria and archaea.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2022
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

S A BurgessSchool of Food and Nutrition, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand. s.burgess1@massey.ac.nz.
S H FlintSchool of Food and Nutrition, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand.
D LindsayFonterra Research Institute, Palmerston North, New Zealand.
M P CoxStatistics and Bioinformatics Group, Institute of Fundamental Sciences, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand.
P J BiggsStatistics and Bioinformatics Group, Institute of Fundamental Sciences, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand. p.biggs@massey.ac.nz.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe genus Geobacillus comprises bacteria that are Gram positive, thermophilic spore-formers, which are found in a variety of environments from hot-springs, cool soils, to food manufacturing plants, including dairy manufacturing plants. Despite considerable interest in the use of Geobacillus spp. for biotechnological applications, the taxonomy of this genus is unclear, in part because of differences in DNA-DNA hybridization (DDH) similarity values between studies. In addition, it is also difficult to use phenotypic characteristics to define a bacterial species. For example, G. stearothermophilus was traditionally defined as a species that does not utilise lactose, but the ability of dairy strains of G. stearothermophilus to use lactose has now been well established.

resultsThis study compared the genome sequences of 63 Geobacillus isolates and showed that based on two different genomic approaches (core genome comparisons and average nucleotide identity) the Geobacillus genus could be divided into sixteen taxa for those Geobacillus strains that have genome sequences available thus far. In addition, using Geobacillus stearothermophilus as an example, we show that inclusion of the accessory genome, as well as phenotypic characteristics, is not suitable for defining this species. For example, this is the first study to provide evidence of dairy adaptation in G. stearothermophilus - a phenotypic feature not typically considered standard in this species - by identifying the presence of a putative lac operon in four dairy strains.

conclusionsThe traditional polyphasic approach of combining both genotypic and phenotypic characteristics to define a bacterial species could not be used for G. stearothermophilus where many phenotypic characteristics vary within this taxon. Further evidence of this discordant use of phenotypic traits was provided by analysis of the accessory genome, where the dairy strains contained a putative lac operon. Based on the findings from this study, we recommend that novel bacterial species should be defined using a core genome approach.

Indexed as

AnimalsFood MicrobiologyGenome, BacterialGenomicsGeobacillus stearothermophilusMilkPhenotypePhylogenySoil MicrobiologyWater MicrobiologyComparative genomicsDairyGeobacillusThermophile

Identifiers

PMID28651524
PMCPMC5485677

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.