Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28651008›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Production and purification of human Hsp90β in Escherichia coli.

Martina Radli, Dmitry B Veprintsev, Stefan G D Rüdiger

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Martina RadliCellular Protein Chemistry, Bijvoet Center for Biomolecular Research, Utrecht University, Padualaan 8, CH Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Dmitry B VeprintsevLaboratory of Biomolecular Research, Paul Scherrer Institut, Villigen PSI, Switzerland.
Stefan G D RüdigerCellular Protein Chemistry, Bijvoet Center for Biomolecular Research, Utrecht University, Padualaan 8, CH Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1807-2972
Utrecht University · NLPaul Scherrer Institute · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The molecular chaperone Hsp90 is an essential member of the cellular proteostasis system. It plays an important role in the stabilisation and activation of a large number of client proteins and is involved in fatal disease processes, e.g. Alzheimer disease, cancer and cystic fibrosis. This makes Hsp90 a crucial protein to study. Mechanistic studies require large amounts of protein but the production and purification of recombinant human Hsp90 in Escherichia coli is challenging and laborious. Here we identified conditions that influence Hsp90 production, and optimised a fast and efficient purification protocol. We found that the nutrient value of the culturing medium and the length of induction had significant effect on Hsp90 production in Escherichia coli. Our fast, single-day purification protocol resulted in a stable, well-folded and pure sample that was resistant to degradation in a reproducible manner. We anticipate that our results provide a useful tool to produce higher amount of pure, well-folded and stable recombinant human Hsp90β in Escherichia coli in an efficient way.

Indexed as

Bacteriological TechniquesCircular DichroismCulture MediaEscherichia coliHSP90 Heat-Shock ProteinsHumansMolecular WeightProtein FoldingProtein StabilityProteolysisRecombinant ProteinsCulture MediaHSP90AB1 protein, humanHSP90 Heat-Shock ProteinsRecombinant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID28651008
PMCPMC5484490
OpenAlexW2951455481

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.