Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28651007›Full record

SynthesisPLoS neglected tropical diseases2017

Urban Chikungunya in the Middle East and North Africa: A systematic review.

John M Humphrey, Natalie B Cleton, Chantal B E M Reusken, Marshall J Glesby, Marion P G Koopmans, Laith J Abu-Raddad

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pathogens and global health · 2020
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Chikungunya virus in Asia - Pacific: a systematic review.Emerging microbes & infections · 2019
    Pooled it
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

John M HumphreyDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, United States of America.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3156-1065
Natalie B CletonViroscience department, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Chantal B E M ReuskenViroscience department, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Marshall J GlesbyDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, United States of America.
Marion P G KoopmansViroscience department, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Laith J Abu-RaddadDepartment of Healthcare Policy and Research, Weill Cornell Medicine, Cornell University, New York, New York, United States of America.

Funding

T32: Pathogenesis of Infectious Diseases Training ProgramT32AI007613 · NIAID · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI ROY M. GULICK · 1999 to 2026
$8.8M
NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI007613
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe epidemiology of Chikungunya virus (CHIKV) in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) is not well characterized despite increasing recognition of its expanding infection and disease burden in recent years. METHODOLOGY / PRINCIPAL

findingsFollowing Cochrane Collaboration guidelines and reporting our findings following PRISMA guidelines, we systematically reviewed records describing the human prevalence and incidence, CHIKV prevalence/infection rates in vectors, outbreaks, and reported cases for CHIKV across the MENA region. We identified 29 human seroprevalence measures, one human incidence study, one study reporting CHIKV infection rates in Aedes, and nine outbreaks and case reports/series reported in the MENA from 1970-2015. Overall, anti-CHIKV antibody or reports of autochthonous transmission were identified from 10 of 23 countries in the MENA region (Djibouti, Egypt, Iraq, Iran, Kuwait, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Somalia, Sudan, and Yemen), with seroprevalence measures among general populations (median 1.0%, range 0-43%) and acute febrile illness populations (median 9.8%, range 0-30%). Sudan reported the highest number of studies (n = 11) and the highest seroprevalence among general populations (median 12%, range 0-43%) and undifferentiated acute febrile illness populations (median 18%, range 10-23%). CHIKV outbreaks were reported from Djibouti, Pakistan, Sudan, and Yemen. CONCLUSIONS / SIGNIFICANCE: Seroprevalence studies and outbreak reports suggest endemic transmission of urban cycle CHIKV in at least the Red Sea region and Pakistan. However, indications of seroprevalence despite a low quantity of CHIKV epidemiologic research from the region suggests that CHIKV transmission is currently underrecognized.

Indexed as

Urban PopulationAedesAfrica, NorthernAnimalsChikungunya FeverChikungunya virusDisease OutbreaksDisease Transmission, InfectiousEndemic DiseasesHumansIncidenceMiddle EastSeroepidemiologic Studies

Identifiers

PMID28651007
PMCPMC5501693

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.