Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28650955›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2017

NetNorM: Capturing cancer-relevant information in somatic exome mutation data with gene networks for cancer stratification and prognosis.

Marine Le Morvan, Andrei Zinovyev, Jean-Philippe Vert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Network Approaches for Precision Oncology.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Differentially mutated subnetworks discovery.Algorithms for molecular biology : AMB · 2019
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Marine Le MorvanMINES ParisTech, PSL Research University, CBIO-Centre for Computational Biology, 75006 Paris, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9899-221X
Andrei ZinovyevMINES ParisTech, PSL Research University, CBIO-Centre for Computational Biology, 75006 Paris, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9517-7284
Jean-Philippe VertMINES ParisTech, PSL Research University, CBIO-Centre for Computational Biology, 75006 Paris, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9510-8441

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genome-wide somatic mutation profiles of tumours can now be assessed efficiently and promise to move precision medicine forward. Statistical analysis of mutation profiles is however challenging due to the low frequency of most mutations, the varying mutation rates across tumours, and the presence of a majority of passenger events that hide the contribution of driver events. Here we propose a method, NetNorM, to represent whole-exome somatic mutation data in a form that enhances cancer-relevant information using a gene network as background knowledge. We evaluate its relevance for two tasks: survival prediction and unsupervised patient stratification. Using data from 8 cancer types from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), we show that it improves over the raw binary mutation data and network diffusion for these two tasks. In doing so, we also provide a thorough assessment of somatic mutations prognostic power which has been overlooked by previous studies because of the sparse and binary nature of mutations.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsBiomarkers, TumorCarcinogenesisChromosome MappingExomeGene Regulatory NetworksGenetic MarkersGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenetic TestingGenome, HumanGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansMutationNeoplasmsPolymorphism, Single NucleotidePrognosisBiomarkers, TumorGenetic Markers

Identifiers

PMID28650955
PMCPMC5507468

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.