Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28650703›Full record

ArticleAIDS patient care and STDs2017

Program Implementation of Option B+ at a President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief-Supported HIV Clinic Improves Clinical Indicators But Not Retention in Care in Mbarara, Uganda.

Kathleen Miller, Winnie Muyindike, Lynn T Matthews, Michael Kanyesigye, Mark J Siedner

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AIDS patient care and STDs, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
7.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Kathleen Miller1 Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School , Boston, Massachusetts.
Winnie Muyindike2 Department of Medicine, Mbarara University of Science and Technology , Mbarara, Uganda .
Lynn T Matthews1 Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School , Boston, Massachusetts.
Michael Kanyesigye2 Department of Medicine, Mbarara University of Science and Technology , Mbarara, Uganda .
Mark J Siedner1 Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School , Boston, Massachusetts.
Harvard University · USMbarara University of Science and Technology · UG

Funding

Behavioral Aspects of Low-cost Medical Devices to Improve HIV CareK23MH099916 · NIMH · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI SIEDNER, MARK J · 2013 to 2017
$917k
NIMH NIH HHS K23 MH099916
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

2013 WHO guidelines for prevention of mother to child transmission recommend combination antiretroviral therapy (ART) for all pregnant women, regardless of CD4 count (Option B/B+). We conducted a retrospective analysis of data from a government-operated HIV clinic in Mbarara, Uganda before and after implementation of Option B+ to assess the impact on retention in care. We limited our analysis to women not on ART at the time of their first reported pregnancy with CD4 count >350. We fit regression models to estimate relationships between calendar period (Option A vs. Option B+) and the primary outcome of interest, retention in care. One thousand and sixty-two women were included in the analysis. Women were more likely to start ART within 6 months of pregnancy in the Option B+ period (68% vs. 7%, p < 0.0001) and had significantly greater increases in CD4 count 1 year after pregnancy (+172 vs. -5 cells, p < 0.001). However, there was no difference in the proportion of women retained in care 1 year after pregnancy (73% vs. 70%, p = 0.34). In models adjusted for age, distance to clinic, marital status, and CD4 count, Option B+ was associated with a nonsignificant 30% increased odds of retention in care at 1 year [adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 1.30, 95% CI 0.98-1.73, p = 0.06]. After transition to an Option B+ program, pregnant women with CD4 count >350 were more likely to initiate combination therapy; however, interventions to mitigate losses from HIV care during pregnancy are needed to improve the health of women, children, and families.

Indexed as

Patient ComplianceAdultAmbulatory Care FacilitiesAnti-Retroviral AgentsBreast FeedingCD4 Lymphocyte CountFemaleGovernment ProgramsHIV InfectionsHumansInfectious Disease Transmission, VerticalLost to Follow-UpOdds RatioPregnancyPregnancy Complications, InfectiousProgram EvaluationAnti-Retroviral AgentsPMTCTpregnancyretention in care

Identifiers

PMID28650703
PMCPMC5564010
OpenAlexW2643801917

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.